SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Raj) 54

ARUN BHANSALI
Shaukat Ali – Appellant
Versus
Bhag Chand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Vishal Sharma, for Petitioner;
Sandeep Saruparia, for Respondents

JUDGMENT :

Hon'ble BHANSALI, J.—This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner aggrieved against the order dated 21.04.2015 passed by the trial court, whereby the application filed by the plaintiffs under Order I, Rule 10 CPC has been allowed and the petitioner, inter alia, has been impleaded as party-defendant to the suit.

2. The respondent No.1-plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of contract dated 07.04.2004. In the written statement, it was, inter alia, indicated that the suit property was already transferred before the suit was filed.

3. The plaintiff filed an application on 11.04.2008 under Order I, Rule 10 CPC seeking to implead the subsequent purchasers as party-defendants. The application was opposed and the trial court by its order dated 24.09.2010 dismissed the application filed by the plaintiff. Feeling aggrieved, plaintiff filed S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.562/2011, the writ petition filed by the plaintiff was disposed of by order dated 19.12.2013, inter alia, with the following observations and directions:-

“In the written statement Banshi Lal, respondent No.1 (defendant no.1) had alleged that he has already sold the suit property to (1) Sheokat Ali, (2) P












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top