RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Jaipur Bench
Gopal & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (Ambwani, CJ.)
HON'BLE SUNIL AMBWANI, C.J.
HON'BLE AJIT SINGH, J.
Gopal & Anr.
Versus
State of Rajasthan & Ors.
D.B. Civil Writ Petition Nos.6894 of 2007, 13751 & 13750 of 2009,
decided on 14.08.2015
Writ petitions dismissed.
jktLFkku ou vf/kfu;e] 1953] /kkjk 20( oU; tho ¼laaj{k.k½ vf/kfu;e] 1972] vkSj 1980( ou ¼lao/kZu½ vf/kfu;e] 1980 & o"kZ 1961 esa oU; tho 'kj.k LFkyh gsrq vkjf{kr vf/klwfpr ou Hkwfe & Hkwfe ij d`f"k vkSj fuekZ.k xfrfof/k;ka pykuk & o"kZ 2007 o 2009 esa 46 o"kZ i'pkr~ Hkwfe vtZu vf/klwpuk fnukafdr 21-11-1961 dks pqUukSrh nh & 1972 ds vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 34&d ds rgr ou foHkkx }kjk uksfVl fn;k x;k & ;kphx.k ewy [kkrsnkj ugha & mUgksaus dsoy 2001 esa gh Hkwfe Ø; dh & vfHkfu/kkZfjr & vf/klwfpr ou Hkwfe esa xSj okfudh xfrfof/k;ka lapkfyr ugha dh tk ldrh & nzO;Drh unh] tks fd t;iqj 'kgj dh thou js[kk gS ds tyxzg.k {ks= esa ck/kk mRiUu djrh gS & fjV ;kfpdk,a LFkwy vLi"Vhd`r O;ixr ls cqjh rjg ls oftZr FkhA fjV ;kfpdk,a [kkfjt dhA ¼in la[;k 19 ls 23½
Hon'ble AMBWANI, C.J.—We have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.
2. In these three writ petitions, the petitioners have prayed for the following reliefs:-
In CWP No.6894/2007:
(i) to declare that the land of petitioners pertaining to khasara Nos.11/71 and 11/76 of village Beed Papad measuring 26 bighas and 15 biswas and 14 bighas and 4 biswas respectively is not included nor could have been included in the reserved forest or Nahargarh Wild Life Sanctuary constituted vide notifications dated 22.11.1961 (Annex.-10) and 22.9.1980 (Annex.18) respectively.
(ii) to declare the notification dated 21.11.1961 (Annex.10) and 22.9.1980 (Annex-18) as null and void and also to quash and set aside the same if for any reason it is decided that the aforesaid land has been included in the reserved forest and Nahargarh Wildlife Sanctuary vide the said notifications;
(iii) to restrain the respondents from dispossessing the petitioners or otherwise interfering in their rights in the land in question and also the use and enjoyment thereof by the petitioners;
(iv) to issue any other appropriate relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case in favour of the petitioner.
(v) to allow the cost of the writ petition in favour of the petitioner.
In CWP No.13751/2009:
(i) to declare the notification dated 21.11.1961 (Annex.23) and 22.9.1980 (Annex.31) as null and void and also to quash and set aside the same if for any reason it is decided that the land mentioned in prayer (ii) has been included in the reserved forest and Nahargarh Wildlife Sanctuary vide the said notifications;
(ii) to declare that the land of petitioners pertaining to khasara Nos. 12/77 & 46/2 of village Beed Papad measuring 217 bighas and 1 biswas is not included nor could have been included in the reserved forest or Nahargarh Wild Life Sanctuary constituted vide notifications dated 22.11.1961 (Annex.23) and 22.9.1980 (Annex.31) respectively.
(iii) to restrain the respondents from dispossessing the petitioners or otherwise interfering in their rights in the land in question and also the use and enjoyment thereof by the petitioners;
(iv)to issue any other appropriate relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case in favour of the petitioners.
(v) to allow the cost of the writ petition in favour of the petitioners.
In CWP No.13750/2009:
(i) to declare the notification dated 21.11.1961 (Annex.15) and 22.9.1980 (Annex-23) as null and void and also to quash and set aside the same if for any reason it is decided that the land mentioned in prayer (ii) has been included in the reserved forest and Nahargarh Wildlife Sanctuary vide the said notifications;
(ii) to declare that the land of petitioners pertaining to khasara Nos.11/75 & 11/70 of village Beed Papad measuring 106 bighas and 18 biswas is not included nor could have been included in the reserved forest or Nahargarh Wild Life Sanctuary constituted vide notifications dated 22.11.1961 (Annex.15) and 22.9.1980 (Annex.23) respectively.
(iii) to quash and set aside the impugned notices dated 30.09.2009 (Annex.-46 & 47) and to restrain the respondents from taking any further actions in pursuance thereof and also to restrain them from dispossessing the petitioners or otherwise interfering in their rights in the land in question and also the use and enjoyment thereof by the petitioners;
(iv) to issue any other appropriate relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case in favour of the petitioners.
(v) to allow the cost of the writ petition in favaour of the petitioners.”
3. A writ petition filed in public interest is pending for rejuvenation of Dravyawati River, which flows from the hills of Nahargarh where the land in dispute is situate, upto River Dhoond, crossing the City of Jaipur for about 47 kms. as an important water source. It was noticed that there are three wri
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.