MOHAMMAD RAFIQ
Gopinath Educational & Welfare Society – Appellant
Versus
Rajendra Singh Shekhawat (HUF) – Respondent
2. Application was filed by the petitioner on 22.08.2015 that Exhibits 7, 8, 9 and 10 being certified copies are not admissible in evidence inasmuch as Exhibit-9 is not original, but certified copy thereof and Exhibit 7, 8 and 10 are certified copies of lease deed, none of them are admissible in evidence. Exhibit-6 is mere Photostat copy of the original and not admissible in evidence. Prayer was made that aforesaid Exhibit 6 to 10 be ordered to be de-exhibited. It may be noted that the aforesaid application was filed by the respondent-landlord in the petition for eviction and awarding mesne profit filed against the petitioner-society. The respondent contested the application. The trial court vide impugned order dated 10.09.2015 partly allowed the application to the extent of document, Exhibit-6 which was held to be not admissible in evidence, but the respondent-lan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.