SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Raj) 142

ALOK SHARMA
Kamal Singh Meena – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Kawal Singh Loha, for Petitioner;
Shailesh Prakash Sharma, for Respondents;
S.P. Singh on behalf of Inderjeet Singh, AAG, for State

Hon'ble SHARMA, J.—The petitioner is aggrieved of the order dated 19.06.2015, passed by the Additional Chief Security Commissioner, Northeast Frontier Railway, Maligaon, Guwahati whereby he has been discharged from training after being recruited as a Constable in the Railway Protection Special Force (hereinafter “RPSF”) for the purported reason of his character and antecedent verification exercise eliciting information from the D.M., Alwar that Police Case No.119/07 for offences under Sections 143, 323, 324, 341 IPC was instituted against him at Kotkashim Police Station and he was under trial therefor. It was further stated in the impugned order that the aforesaid fact, having been suppressed and not set out in the Attestation Form submitted by the petitioner, entailed violation of para No.3 of the Attestation Form consequent to which he was rendered unfit for Government service as per Rule 52.2 & 67.2 of Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987 (hereinafter “the Rules of 1987”) and liable to be discharged with immediate effect.

2. The facts not in dispute are that the petitioner was selec




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top