SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Raj) 527

AJAY RASTOGI, J.K.RANKA
Rameshwar Prasad Soni – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Banwari Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Pradeep Kalwania, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

Instant special appeal has been preferred against order of the learned Single Judge dated 17.2.2016.

2. The substantial question raised in the batch of writ petitions was whether the Chairperson/Members of the Panchayati Raj Institutions can be removed, proceeded against in an enquiry u/sec. 39 of the Rajasthan Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 read with Rule 23 of the Panchati Raj Rules, 1996 and/or suspended u/sec. 38(4) of the Act 1994 in respect of pre-election disqualifications. Keeping in view the Full Bench judgment of this court in the case of Smt. Sameera Bano v. State of Rajasthan 2007 (2) RLW 1674, the batch of writ petitions came to be disposed of by the learned Single Judge and observed ad infra :-

"The petitions are accordingly allowed. The enquiry under Section 39 of the Act of 1994 read with Rule 23 of the Rules of 1996 and suspension of elected members for allegations of pre-election disqualification under Section 38(4) of the Act of 1994 except where charges have been framed for offences of moral turpitude are quashed.

It is however clarified that the State Government however would be free, if warranted in specific cases, to conduct only a fact finding enquiry for ta








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top