Mahesh Chanra Sharma, J.

1. This bail application has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. with the following prayer:

"It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this bail application under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. may kindly be allowed and the petitioner may be granted anticipatory bail in case of arrest in FIR No. 66/2015 lodged at P.S. Pratap Nagar, Jaipur, District Jaipur."

2. Brief facts of the case are that the allegation against the petitioner is that he took Rs. 60,000/- and entered into an agreement with the complainant to sell his house, which was to be delivered soon by the Rajasthan Housing Board. Further allegation was that the complainant deposited a sum of Rs. 23,87,000/- only in Raj. Housing Board in pursuance of contract. The Raj. Housing Board later on denied the registry of the house to the complainant because the accused had already taken the refund in the year 1998, therefore, the complainant filed an FIR No. 66/2015 at PS Pratap Nagar, Jaipur, District Jaipur for the offences mentioned therein. The police interrogated the petitioner and is bent upon to arrest the petitioner, therefore, due to apprehension of arrest, the petitioner moved the anticipatory bail application before the court below, but the same was dismissed vide order dated 4.2.2016 with the following observations:-

^^dsl Mk;jh ds voyksdu ls izrhr gksrk gS fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr us jktLFkku vkoklu e.My t;iqj dh lkekU; iathdj.k ;kstuk 1982 esa iathdj.k jkf'k 4]600@& :i;s tek djok dj vkosnu fd;k Fkk rFkk mDr jkf'k ls mldk iathdj.k dj fy;k x;k Fkk ijUrq foHkkx us mDr iathdj.k jkf'k e; C;kt ds izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks okil ykSVk nh xbZ] tks jkf'k izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks izkIr gks xbZ ijUrq mlds ckotwn Hkh izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds }kjk iqu% LofoRr iksf"kr ;kstuk esa iwoZ iathd`r vkosnd gksuk crkrs gq, ek/;e vk; oxZ ^^oh** gsrq fnukad 17-09-2012 dks vkosnu dj fn;k rFkk iathdj.k djok fy;kA mDr iathdj.k dks fnukad 31-07-2012 dks izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds }kjk ifjoknh fo".kq nRr 'kekZ dks fodz; djus dk eq[R;kjvke fu"ikfnr dj fn;kA ifjoknh }kjk mDr eq[R;kjukek ds vuqlkj vkoklu e.My esa 23]87]000@& :i;s dh jkf'k tek djok nh rFkk ckn esa ifjoknh mDr edku dh jftLVªh vius gd esa djkus ds fy, vkoklu e.My esa x;k rks ogkWa ls tkudkjh feyh fd xksjs'k dqekj dk iwoZ iathdj.k o"kZ 1982 fujLr dj fn;k x;k gS rFkk mlds }kjk tek djokbZ jkf'k e; C;kt mldks ykSVk nh xbZ gS] bl dkj.k vc dksbZ edku vkoaVu ugha fd;k tk ldrkA bl izdkj izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds }kjk tc mlds }kjk o"kZ 1982 esa iathdj.k jkf'k vkoklu e.My ls izkIr fd;s tkus dk ckotwn Hkh iqu% u;k vkosnu i= is'k dj iathdj.k djok;k vkSj ml iathdj.k ds vuqlkj vkoafVr edku dks ifjoknh dks cSpkus dk bdjkj dj mlds lkFk /kks[kk/kM+h dj jkf'k izkIr dj yh rFkk vkoklu e.My esa tek djok nhA vHkh ekeyk vuqla/kkuk/khu gS] ;fn izkFkhZ vfHk;qDr dks vfxze tekur dk ykHk ns fn;k tkrk gS] rks vuqla/kku ij foijhr izHkko iM+sxkA vr% ekeys ds mijksDr leLr rF;ksa o ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk eSa bl Lrj ij izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks vfxze tekur ij fjgk fd;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr ugha ikrk gwaA**

3. Against the said judgment/order dated 4.2.2016, the instant bail application has been filed.

4. This court vide order dated 11.2.2016 has passed the following order: "List the matter on 12.2.2016. On the said date the I.O. of the case shall remain personally present before this court along with the case diary."

5. Thereafter on 15.2.2016, this court has passed the following order:-

bl ekeys esa vkt vk;qDr] jktLFkku vkoklu e.My dks U;k;ky; ds le{k ryc fd;k x;k D;ksafd jktLFkku vkoklu e.My esa iw.kZ :i ls Hkz"Vkpkj O;kIr gksuk izrhr gksrk gSA

vkt Jh 'kadj dqekor] lfpo] jktLFkku vkoklu e.My bl U;k;ky; ds le{k mifLFkr gSa] ftUgksaus dFku fd;k fd vk;qDr] vkoklu e.My dh rfc;r [kjkc gksus ls mUgksaus nks fnol dk vodk'k ys fy;k gS ,oa mUgksaus U;k;ky; ds le{k viuh vuqifLFkfr ds lEcU/k esa ekQh pkgh gSA fdUrq ;g U;k;ky; blls lUrq"V ugha gSA ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd os U;k;ky; ds le{k viuh mifLFkfr dks Vkyuk pkgrs gSa D;ksafd jktLFk