SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Raj) 439

IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J.
Bhagwan Sahay & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
Ganguram & Ors. - Respondents
Civil Misc. Appeal No. 579 of 1996
Decided On : 11-02-2016

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : B.C. Rawat

The court established principles for determining the compensation payable to the dependents of a housewife killed in a motor vehicle accident, including the assessment of her income, contribution to the family, application of a multiplier, and deposit of the compensation amount in a Monthly Income Scheme.

Headnote:

MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT - ASSESSMENT OF COMPENSATION - HOUSEWIFE - INCOME DETERMINATION - CONTRIBUTION TO FAMILY - MULTIPLIER - INTEREST ON AWARD - DEPOSIT IN MONTHLY INCOME SCHEME.

Fact of the Case:

A fatal motor vehicle accident resulted in the death of Smt. Durga Devi, a housewife. Her legal heirs filed a claim petition before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, which awarded compensation. The claimants appealed, seeking enhancement of the award.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the accident occurred due to the rash and negligent driving of the offending vehicle. It also determined that the deceased was a housewife who contributed to the family's upkeep.

Issues: 1. Assessment of compensation for a housewife killed in a motor vehicle accident. 2. Determination of the deceased's income and contribution to the family. 3. Application of multiplier and calculation of compensation. 4. Award of interest on the compensation amount. 5. Deposit of the compensation amount in a Monthly Income Scheme.

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court relied on precedents to determine the income of a housewife for the purpose of calculating compensation. It considered the deceased's age, the prevailing wage rates, and the contribution she made to the family. 2. The court applied a multiplier of 12 to the deceased's annual income to calculate the compensation amount. 3. The court awarded interest on the compensation amount from the date of filing the petition till realization. 4. The court directed that the enhanced compensation amount be deposited in a Monthly Income Scheme with the Indian Post Office for the benefit of the claimants.

Final Decision: The court enhanced the compensation awarded by the Tribunal to Rs. 5,32,000/-. It directed that the amount be kept in a Monthly Income Scheme in the post office for a lock-up period of three years, with the interest accrued upon the deposit to be paid to the claimants proportionately on a monthly basis.

JUDGMENT :

Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J.

On 28.5.1994 at about 5:30 PM, on National Highway No.11 near village Sikandara Ki Dhani, Kumari Bina and Smt. Durga Devi were travelling in tractor. The tractor was parked on the side, when a Tanker bearing Registration No. GJ 12 T 8512 came from the side of Manpur in a rash and negligent manner and collided with the parked tractor. As a result thereof, Smt. Durga Devi and Kumari Bina died. Legal heirs of Durga Devi filed a claim petition. The said claim petition was decided by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Dausa Camp at Bandikui by giving award dated 6.2.1996.

2. The finding given by the Tribunal that the accident had occurred due to rash and negligent driving of offending vehicle has not been assailed. The present appeal has been filed for enhancement of the award given in favour of the claimants of Durga Devi.

3. The Tribunal in its award determined the age of Durga Devi as 45 years. The Tribunal noted that in his testimony Ram Dayal A.W.1 son of Durga Devi deceased deposed that Durga Devi was earning Rs.2500/- per month as a labourer and being a housewife was contributing for up-keep of her family. It is also admitted fact that Durga Devi after accident was admitted in SMS Hospital, Jaipur, where she died after six days of the occurrence. The Tribunal noted that Post Mortem of Durga Devi was performed on 3.6.1994 and the occurrence had taken place on 28.5.1994, therefore, Durga Devi in an injured condition was taken to the hospital at Jaipur. The Tribunal awarded Rs.2,000/- as transportation expenses for taking injured to the hospital. The Tribunal held that there is no evidence brought on record that Durga Devi was earning Rs.2,500/- per month as a labourer. However, the Tribunal assessed Rs.600/- per month as contribution of Durga Devi towards family and assessed his annual income as Rs.7,200/-. The Tribunal further held that out of said income, ?rd is to be deducted as personal living expenses for Durga Devi and thereafter, applied multiplier of 12 and awarded Rs.89,600/- as compensation. Besides the above amount, the Tribunal also awarded Rs.5,000/- to each family member towards physical pain and loss. The Tribunal further held that since offending vehicle was insured with the respondent No.4 United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Jaipur, the amount of compensation is liable to be paid by the Insurance Company.

4. Nobody has appeared on behalf of the Insurance Company.

5. The learned counsel for the appellant has relied upon the case of Lata Wadhwa & Ors. v. State of Bihar & Ors. 2001 ACJ 1735, and contended that Supreme Court in the said case had determined income of deceased housewife in the age group of 34 to 59 years as Rs.36,000/- per annum. It is stated that incident in the case of Lata Wadhwa (supra) had taken place in March, 1989. The learned counsel for the appellant has further relied upon Arun Kumar Agrawal & Anr. v. National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors., 2010 ACJ 2161, wherein for determining the contribution of housewife, it was observed as under:-

"23. In India the Courts have recognised that the contribution made by the wife to the house is invaluable and cannot be computed in terms of money. The gratuitous services rendered by wife with true love and affection to the children and her husband and managing the household affairs cannot be equated with the services rendered by others. A wife/mother does not work by the clock. She is in the constant attendance of the family throughout the day and night unless she is employed and is required to attend the employer's work for particular hours. She takes care of all the requirements of husband and children including cooking of food, washing of clothes, etc. She teaches small children and provides invaluable guidance to them for their future life. A housekeeper or maidservant can do the household work, such as cooking food,









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top