SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Raj) 917

DEEPAK MAHESHWARI
Gulab Chand – Appellant
Versus
Madhu Das – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Dhanesh Saraswat and Mr. Navneet Singh Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr. Ashwini K. Babel, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

Deepak Maheshwari, J.

Heard the learned counsels for both the parties and perused the relevant documents as also the impugned judgment dated 11th March, 2014.

2. The learned counsel for the respondents has furnished the copy of the judgment dated 19th March, 2013 passed by this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2988/2011 titled as "Gulab Chand v. Madhu Das & Ors." whereby, the writ petition filed by the appellant has been dismissed. The appellant has sought the relief by way of this writ petition to restrain the concerned authority from making entry in respect of mutation in favour of the respondents No. 2 and 3, who are respondents herein also. In view of the judgment dated 19th March, 2013, the prayer of the appellant/applicant is found devoid of merit and is liable to be rejected.

3. By way of this second stay petition, the appellant has prayed to maintain the status-quo with regard to possession over the land in dispute but in view of the findings given by the learned trial Court in the impugned judgment dated 11th March, 2014 regarding possession over the disputed land as also taking this fact into consideration that the same relief had been claimed by the appellant


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top