SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Raj) 693

ARUN BHANSALI
Harish Borana – Appellant
Versus
JVVNL – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Raju Chaynan, Advocate.

ORDER :

Arun Bhansali, J.

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner aggrieved against the order dated 20.4.2016 passed by the trial court, whereby in the suit filed by the petitioner application filed by the landlord under Order I, Rule 10 C.P.C. has been accepted.

2. The petitioner filed proceedings before the Rent Tribunal. The Rent Tribunal, after hearing the parties i.e. landlord and Jodhpur Vidhyut Vitran Nigam Limited ('JVVNL'), passed injunction for grant of electricity connection to the petitioner in accordance with law as the electricity connection, which was already existing in the name of landlord was disconnected on the application of the landlord.

3. Where after, the petitioner was granted electricity connection and when the same was disconnected, the present suit before the Civil Court by impleading only JVVNL was filed seeking injunction against the said JVVNL. In the suit, the landlord filed an application seeking impleadment as party.

4. The application was opposed by the petitioner.

5. The trial court, after hearing the parties, came to the conclusion that the presence of said landlord was necessary to the suit and allowed the application.

6. Learned counsel fo






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top