By this Special Appeal, the judgment of the learned Single Judge so as the Board of Revenue has been assailed. A suit was preferred by the appellant claiming right in the land in dispute. The suit was dismissed, however on appeal, the Revenue Appellate Authority decreed the suit. On second appeal before the Board of Revenue, the order of the Revenue Appellate Authority was reversed while maintaining the order of the first Revenue Court. On a writ petition preferred by the appellant, the order passed by the Board of Revenue has been maintained.

2. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that after the death of original khatedar of the land in dispute, the name of the appellant's father and wife of the deceased was mutated. The appellant's father was shown to be adopted son of deceased Duli Chand. The entry in the 'Jamabandi' remained for more than 60 years and based on it, a suit was filed by the appellant. It should have been decreed. The Revenue Appellate Authority had drawn proper conclusions to decree the suit. It was wrongly interfered with by the Board of Revenue and the order passed by the Board of Revenue has been upheld by the learned Single Judge. The evidence