SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Raj) 408

ARUN BHANSALI
Yonus Bhati – Appellant
Versus
Shahariyar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Surendra Surana, Advocate.

ORDER :

Arun Bhansali, J.

These writ petitions have been filed by the petitioner aggrieved against the order dated 7.11.2016 passed by the learned court below, whereby on applications filed by the respondent-Shahariyar under Order 7, Rule 11 CPC in the two suits, the Court has directed the petitioner to value the suits in terms of the provisions of the Rajasthan Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1961 ('the Act') and pay the court fees accordingly and another application filed by the petitioner seeking consolidation of two suits has been dismissed.

2. The petitioners filed suit No.71/11 seeking permanent and mandatory injunction against Shahariyar, Jime and Municipal Board, Mount Abu. The suit was filed based on the facts that pursuant to the agreement to sale dated 30.3.1998 executed by Shri Praveen Chand Ranchhod Lal Joshi for a sum of Rs. 42 lacs, the petitioners were in possession of the suit property and under the provisions of Order 2, Rule 2 CPC reserved his right to file a suit for specific performance. However, it was claimed that the respondents were seeking to dispossess the petitioners and therefore, prayed that injunction be granted.

3. Another suit being 46/2012 was file

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top