Varun Kumar Karwasra vs Union of India

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2016 Supreme(Raj) 526

AJAY RASTOGI, J.K.RANKA
Varun Kumar Karwasra – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mukesh Agarwal
For the Respondents: P.C. Sharma, Anupam Agarwal

JUDGMENT :

Ajay Rastogi, J.

Instant petition is directed against order of the ld.Central Administrative Tribunal dated 17.03.2015.

2. The brief facts of the case which are relevant for the present purpose are that a Notification was issued by the respondents holding recruitment for the post of Senior Section Engineer in the Grade Pay of Rs.4,600/- in different branches. The petitioner being eligible submitted his application and was declared successful in the Signal category and after found suitable was appointed vide order dated 14.06.2013, subject to verification of medical and antecedents and directed to fill the Attestation Form and other relevant documents.

3. In the Attestation Form, the candidate is required to furnish, apart from desired information, his/her antecedents. The relevant conditions of Attestation Form para-12, extract of which being relevant for the present purpose is reproduced ad infra:-

"12.(a)	Have you ever been arrested?	Yes/No	No
(b)	Have you ever been prosecuted?	Yes/No	No
(c)	Have you ever been kept under detention?	Yes/No

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2016 Supreme(Raj) 526

AJAY RASTOGI, J.K.RANKAVarun Kumar Karwasra – AppellantVersusUnion of India – Respondent

Cases Referred (5)

AJAY RASTOGI, J.K.RANKA
Varun Kumar Karwasra – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent