SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Raj) 668

SANGEET LODHA
Hema Ram – Appellant
Versus
Ram Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:A.R. Godara, Advocate
For the Respondent:A.R. Godara, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Sangeet Lodha, J.

These writ petitions are directed against order dated 2.5.14 passed by the Additional District Judge, Sujangarh in Appeal No. 6/10, affirming the order dated 29.5.10 passed by the Civil Judge (J.D.), Sujangarh in Civil Misc. Case No. 13/10 granting injunction in favour of the plaintiff Ram Singh.

2. The relevant facts are that the plaintiff-Ram Singh preferred a suit for 'declaration of easementary right and permanent injunction against the defendants-Smt. Jethi and others, accompanied by an application seeking temporary injunction. The plaintiff claimed that he is using a way passing through the agriculture field of the defendants since the time of his forefathers and therefore he has acquired an easementary right to use the way. The temporary injunction was sought by the plaintiff in terms that pending disposal of the suit, the defendants may be restrained from obotructing the existing way available to the petitioner and may not create hindrance in movement of his livestock, tractor, camel cart etc. passing through the existing way.

3. The application seeking temporary injunction was contested by the defendants by filing 3 reply thereto. The defendants sp











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top