SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Raj) 1501

ALOK SHARMA
Anurodh – Appellant
Versus
Kedar Nath Gupta – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Anil Upman
For the Respondents: Mr. Raj Kamal Gaur

JUDGMENT :

Alok Sharma, J.

By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India a challenge has been laid to the order dated 27.11.2010 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Jr. Division) No.2, Dholpur, dismissing the petitioner tenant's application under Order 6 Rule 17 Civil Procedure Code for amendment of his written statement.

2. Facts of the case are that a suit for eviction was filed by the plaintiff respondent (hereinafter, the respondent) in the year 1991 against the petitioner tenant (hereinafter "the tenant") and his mother and others. The said suit is being duly contested by the mother of the tenant and others and written statements have been filed therein. At the time of filing of the suit for eviction, as the petitioner tenant was a minor, one Shri T.K. Modi, an Advocate of repute came to be appointed as his guardian ad litem and a written statement came to be filed on behalf of the tenant as defendant in suit on or about 30th September, 1983.

3. In the aforesaid suit, issues have already been settled as early as 8th July, 2003 and the evidence of one of the landlords Shri Purushottam Das taken by way of an affidavit in evidence and he cross examined on 17th Jul












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top