SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Raj) 1113

R.S.CHAUHAN
Fakira Ram – Appellant
Versus
Harnek Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. R.S. Choudhary
For the Respondent: Mr. N.L. Joshi

JUDGMENT :

R.S. Chauhan, J.

The appellants are aggrieved by the order dated 19.07.2012 passed by the Additional District Judge, Anooopgarh Camp, Gharsana District, Sri Ganganagar, whereby the learned Judge has dismissed the appellants' application under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 read with Section 151 Civil Procedure Code.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellants filed a suit for declaration of power of attorney and sale deed as null and void. Along with plaint, they also filed an application for temporary injunction. They claimed that agricultural land in Chak No.16A Tehsil Anoopgarh in Square No.299/449, 301/449 and 300/49 measuring 24 bighas 6 biswas was allotted in 1974 in favour of their father, Shri Budh Ram. Ever since the allotment, their father and after him, the appellants have the Floating Frame possession of the said land. In 1999, the respondent, Dr. Surendra Yadav and Dr. Ramesh Yadav asked the appellants to vacate the land as they claimed that the land was allotted to them. According to the appellants, the respondent and other persons joined hands and prepared a forged power of attorney of their father in 1987, and got it registered. But the fact remains that th











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top