SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Raj) 640

ARUN BHANSALI
Bal Kishan – Appellant
Versus
Manoj Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: G.R. Goyal
For the Respondents: N.L. Joshi

JUDGMENT :

Arun Bhansali, J.

This revision petition is directed against the order dated 04.09.2012 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) No.3, Bikaner ('the trial court'), whereby, the application filed by the petitioners under Order 7, Rule 11(a) & (d) CPC has been dismissed.

2. The facts in brief may be noticed thus: the respondent-plaintiffs filed a suit seeking declaration and injunction regarding land said to be comprised in Khasra No.1135, which according to the plaintiffs was being used by them for the purpose of cremation and there were also temple & samadhies on the said land.

3. Based on the averments contained in the plaint, it was submitted that the said land was sought to be trespassed by the petitioners and, therefore, they be restrained from occupying the said land and from stopping the plaintiffs form using the land as cremation place and not to demolish the temple etc.

4. An application under Order 7, Rule 11 CPC was filed by the petitioners, inter alia, with the averments that the land in question was an agriculture land and, therefore, the suit was barred under Section 207 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955. It was further claimed that the suit has be












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top