SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Raj) 1094

M.N.BHANDARI
Rachna – Appellant
Versus
Savita – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Azad Ahmed
For the Respondent: H.P. Singh

JUDGMENT :

M.N. Bhandari, J.

1. By this writ petition, a challenge is made to the order dated 22.10.2016, whereby, application filed by the petitioner under Order 7 Rule 11 Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) has been dismissed.

2. Learned counsel submits that an election petition was filed under the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj (Election) Rules, 1994 (for short 'the Rules of 1994'). It was by invoking rule 80 of the Rules of 1994. As per rule 81 of the Rules of 1994, presentation of the election petition can be by a candidate at such election or by a person authorized by him/her in writing by the person making the petition. In the instant case, election petition has been filed by an Advocate, who was not authorized for presentation thereof. The petitioner raised objection regarding maintainability of the election petition, however, the application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC has been dismissed in ignorance of the rule 81(1) of the Rules of 1994. Reference of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of "GV Sreerama Reddy & anr versus Returning Officer & ors", (2009) 8 SCC 736 has been given where similar issue was decided.

3. Learned counsel for respondent No. 1 has opposed the writ petition. He






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top