M.N.BHANDARI
Rachna – Appellant
Versus
Savita – Respondent
M.N. Bhandari, J.
1. By this writ petition, a challenge is made to the order dated 22.10.2016, whereby, application filed by the petitioner under Order 7 Rule 11 Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) has been dismissed.
2. Learned counsel submits that an election petition was filed under the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj (Election) Rules, 1994 (for short 'the Rules of 1994'). It was by invoking rule 80 of the Rules of 1994. As per rule 81 of the Rules of 1994, presentation of the election petition can be by a candidate at such election or by a person authorized by him/her in writing by the person making the petition. In the instant case, election petition has been filed by an Advocate, who was not authorized for presentation thereof. The petitioner raised objection regarding maintainability of the election petition, however, the application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC has been dismissed in ignorance of the rule 81(1) of the Rules of 1994. Reference of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of "GV Sreerama Reddy & anr versus Returning Officer & ors", (2009) 8 SCC 736 has been given where similar issue was decided.
3. Learned counsel for respondent No. 1 has opposed the writ petition. He
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.