SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Raj) 147

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA, J.
Omprakash S/o Shri Panchu Lal - Appellant
Versus
Deepraj S/o Shri Babulal & Ors. - Respondents
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 679 of 2017
Decided On : 14-02-2017

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. Akshat Chaudhary
For the Respondents: Mr. Ritesh Jain, Mr. Akshay Sharma

The court's decision was influenced by the compromise reached between the parties, leading to an enhanced amount of compensation for the claimants, and outlined provisions for timely deposit of the enhanced amount, interest in case of delay, and remedies for breach of insurance policy.

Headnote:

Compromise - Motor Accident Claims Tribunal - The court disposed of the appeal based on the compromise reached between the claimants and the insurance company, resulting in an enhanced amount of compensation for the claimants. The court directed the insurance company to deposit the enhanced amount with the tribunal within a specified period, with provisions for interest in case of delay and remedies for breach of insurance policy.

Fact of the Case:

The appeal was filed against the judgment and award passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal for enhancement of compensation. The parties agreed to dispose of the appeal based on a compromise, resulting in an enhanced amount of compensation for the claimants.

Finding of the Court:

The court partly allowed the appeal and directed the insurance company to deposit the enhanced amount with the tribunal within a specified period. Provisions for interest in case of delay and remedies for breach of insurance policy were also outlined.

Issues:

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the compromise reached between the parties, leading to an enhanced amount of compensation for the claimants. Provisions for timely deposit of the enhanced amount, interest in case of delay, and remedies for breach of insurance policy were key considerations.

Final Decision: The appeal was partly allowed, and the insurance company was directed to deposit the enhanced amount with the tribunal within a specified period, with provisions for interest in case of delay and remedies for breach of insurance policy.

JUDGMENT :

This appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment and award passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal for enhancement of the quantum of compensation.

2. Keeping in view the pious work of Lok Adalat, at this stage, the counsel for both the parties i.e. the claimants and the insurance company agree that this appeal may be disposed of on the basis of the compromise.

3. The learned counsel for the respondent/insurance company gave consent for enhancing the amount of the award i.e. Rs.40,000/- (rupees forty thousands only) in favour of claimants. This amount shall be in addition to the amount awarded by the learned Tribunal and the claimants-appellants are held entitled to get the aforesaid amount.

4. In view of above, this appeal is partly allowed and it is directed that the respondent-insurance company shall deposit the aforesaid enhanced amount with the learned Tribunal within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and the same shall be disbursed to the claimants immediately. In case the amount is not paid to the claimants within the stipulated period of six weeks, the claimants shall be entitled to interest @ 9% per annum on the enhanced amount from the date of passing of this judgment. Rest of the terms under the award shall remain unchanged.

5. However, it is made clear that if there is any breach of insurance policy or violation of the terms of the policy, the respondent/insurance company shall be at liberty to move an application before the executing court for recovering the amount from the owner of the offending vehicle or he can move an application before this court for recalling of the order.

6. The impugned award stands modified, as indicated hereinabove.


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top