NAVIN SINHA, VIJAY KUMAR VYAS
H. R. Choudhary – Appellant
Versus
Central Administrative Tribunal – Respondent
Navin Sinha, J.
1. The present writ petition assails order dated 26/07/2012 of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jaipur Bench dismissing OA No. 102/2011 declining relief for payment of pension and gratuity.
2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that he was suspended on 13/12/2004 under Rule 10(1) of the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 (hereinafter referred as the "CCS Rules") in contemplation of a departmental proceeding. He superannuated on 31/12/2004. Till that date, no charge-sheet was issued or served upon him. On 18/01/2005 orders were issued that in view of the pendency of a vigilance case, provisional pension was sanctioned withholding Death-cum-Retirement Gratuity/CVP till conclusion of the vigilance case. This order was totally unjustified and based on a non-est ground as no departmental proceeding had been initiated till superannuation. The petitioner was therefore entitled to full pension and gratuity with interest.
3. It was next submitted that he was convicted on a criminal charge for the death of his daughter-in-law under Section 306 IPC on 16/12/2004. It had nothing to do with discharge of his official duties.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.