SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Raj) 232

GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS, KAILASH CHANDRA SHARMA
Roshan Lal – Appellant
Versus
Sushila – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Love Jain on behalf of Deepak Menaria.

JUDGMENT :

1. The instant misc. appeal has been filed by the appellant/husband, Roshan Lal, under Section 19 of the Family Court Act, 1984 read with Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, being aggrieved against the judgment dated 20th of October, 2016 passed by learned Judge, Family Court, Rajsamand in Civil Misc. Case No. 74/2016, whereby the learned court below allowed the application filed by the respondent/wife under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (Act of 1955) and granted divorce decree in favour of respondent/wife, Sushila.

2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that an application for grant of divorce against the appellant/husband was filed by the respondent, Sushila, inter-alia, on the ground that she was married with the appellant in the year 1998 and after attaining majority, she started living with the appellant as his wife. According to respondent/wife, she was treated badly by the appellant as no child was born out of their wedlock. The respondent further stated that she was mentally harassed for not having any child. It is also alleged that she was harassed for demand of dowry and ousted her out from the matrimonial home. An FIR was also lodged b


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top