Vijay Kumar Vyas, J.

Heard learned counsel for rival parties and perused the material available on record.

2. Brief facts to decide the present controversy are that petitioner Jagdish was tried by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Bandikui in following six matters for charges under Section 420, 406 and 120-B IPC and was convicted and sentenced. Learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Bandikui decided respective appeals vide judgment mentioned below:-

u/s 420 IPC	Three years' S.I. with fine of Rs. 1,00,000; in default of thereof, to further undergo six months S.I.
u/s 406 IPC	Three years' S.I.
u/s 120-B IPC	Six months' S.I.

3. During hearing of appeals, an application Under Section 427 Cr.P.C. was moved by the petitioner, but while deciding the appeals no order was passed thereon.

Consequently a revision under Section 397 Cr.P.C. was preferred before this court which was registered as S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No.656/2016. Co-ordinate Bench of this court while deciding the revision vide orde