SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Raj) 1249

GOVERDHAN BARDHAR
Lichhu Ram @ Laxman Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. M.K. Garg
For the Appellant-State : Mr. Ashok Upadhyaya

JUDGMENT :

Goverdhan Bardhar, J.

This criminal appal has been filed against the judgment dated 15.03.1994 passed by learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Attrocities) Cases, Churu (for short "the trial court") in Criminal Case No. 15/92 whereby, he convicted the appellant under Section 341, 323 IPC, Section 3(i)(x) of SC/ST (Prevention of Attrocities) Act and sentenced him as under :-

Offence Sentence awarded by the trial court

U/s 341 IPC To undergo one months' rigorous imprisonment along with fine of Rs.200/- in default of fine to further undergone 15 days rigorous imprisonment

U/s 323 IPC To undergo one months' rigorous imprisonment along with fine of Rs.200/- in default of fine to further undergone 15 days rigorous imprisonment.

US/3(i)(x) SC/ST (Prevention of Attrocities) Act To undergo six months rigorous imprisonment along with fine of Rs. 500/- and in default of payment of fine to further undergo one month's simple imprisonment.

2. Brief facts of the case are that a First Information Report was lodged on 22.05.1992 by complainant Asu Ram stating therein that on 21.05.1992 famine camp was going on in village Duliasar. It is stated that he went along with Patwari Shyam Sunder










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top