SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Raj) 1206

P.K.LOHRA
Sunita Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Surendra Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants :Ravi Bhansali, Senior Advocate with Vipul Dharnia, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Sanjeev Johari, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

P.K. Lohra, J.

This appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short 'the Act') depicts a sordid tale of appellants family which lost its mentor/Karta in a road accident. The gory tragedy in the family engulfed life of a young man Mr. K.C. Gupta with admirable credentials as he was a technocrat and entrepreneur. Endeavour of the appellants in the instant appeal is to seek enhancement of compensation awarded by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Bhilwara (for short 'the learned Tribunal').

2. Succinctly stated facts of the case are that appellants laid a claim petition under Section 166 of the Act alleging therein that on 18.3.1993 truck No. HR 23/2005 owned by respondent Nos. 1 to 4 and insured with the fifth respondent dashed with Maruti Car No DDU 935 at 11.30 p.m. near Hamirgarh National Highway in which deceased K.C. Gupta was travelling with his two drivers Fazal Hussain and Suresh Kumar. Attributing negligence to the driver of the truck, it is stated in the claim petition that truck was driven by its driver rashly and negligently at a fast spe













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top