SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Raj) 1201

VIJAY BISHNOI
Abdul Aziz – Appellant
Versus
Indsaind Bank, through Aditya Agrawal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Pankaj Gupta.

JUDGMENT :

Vijay Bishnoi, J.

1. This Criminal Misc. Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of the petitioner being aggrieved with the order dated 1.12.2015 passed by Addl. Sessions Judge No. 2, Chittorgarh (hereinafter referred to as the revisional court) in Criminal Revision Petition No. 31/2015, whereby, the revision petition filed by the petitioner has been dismissed. The said revision petition was filed by the petitioner against the order dated 12.5.2015 passed by Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Chittorgarh (hereinafter referred to as the trial court) in Criminal Case No. 109/2010, whereby, the trial court has accepted the application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. filed on behalf of the respondent and ordered to recall the power of attorney holder of the respondent Bank for reexamination before it.

2. Proceedings under Section 138 of the N.I. Act are pending against the petitioner before the trial court. The said proceedings were initiated at the instance of the respondent Bank through its power of attorney holder Mr. Aditya Agrawal. The power of attorney executed by the Bank in favour Mr. Aditya Agrawal was not produced in the court at the time of filing o




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top