SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Raj) 779

GOVIND MATHUR, P.K.LOHRA
State of Rajasthan – Appellant
Versus
Shyam Lal Purohit – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : S.M. Toshniwal
For the Respondent: Ravi Bhansali

JUDGMENT :

Govind Mathur, J.

This appeal is barred by limitation from 265 days. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that he is having no objection in getting the delay in filing the appeal condoned. Accordingly, the application preferred under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of delay in filing the appeal is allowed. The delay of 265 days in filing the appeal is condoned.

2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the appeal is heard on merits.

3. In brief, facts of the case are that the respondent petitioner Mr. Shyam Lal Purohit claimed appointment as per the provisions of the Rajasthan Compassionate Appointment of Dependents of Deceased Government Servant Rules, 1996 being adopted son of Mr. Heera Lal Purohit, who died while in service on 25.05.2008. The appellant-respondents denied him appointment on the count that in his mark-sheet relating to 8th Standard Examination, he has been shown as son of Mr. Mangi Lal Purohit, his original father. It is also stated that in the year 1997-98, the age of respondent-petitioner Mr. Shyam Lal Purohit was more than 15 years, therefore, subsequent thereto, he could have not been adopted as per the provisions







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top