1. - Petitioner has filed this revision petition under Section 397 read with 401 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 challenging the order dated 20.8.2016 whereby charges were framed against the petitioner by Special Judge in F.I.R. No. 143 dated 11.4.2000 registered at Police Station Kotwali, Sawaimadhopur, District Sawaimadhopur and the application for discharging the petition was dismissed.

2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been falsely involved in this case. In fact there was no evidence against the petitioner qua commission of offence in question. Petitioner had not misused his power nor had given any undue benefit to himself or anybody else. In support of his argument learned Counsel has placed reliance on the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in C.K. Jaffer Sharief v. State (Through CBI), (2013) 1 Supreme Court Cases 205 wherein, it was held as under:

"Adverting to the facts of the present case it has already been noticed that the only allegation against the appellant is that he had prevailed upon RITES and IRCON to take the four employees in question on "deputation" for the sole purpose of sending them to London in connecti