SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Raj) 1585

MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA
Sarveshwar – Appellant
Versus
Imran – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Sandeep Mathur, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Sukh Ram Jatav, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. - This appeal has been filed against the impugned judgement and award dated 2.1.2012 passed by learned Judge, MACT, Jaipur & Addl. Distt. Judge (FT) No. 7, Jaipur City, Jaipur.

2. Brief facts of the case are that on 25.2.2009 the claimant-appellant and one Raghunath were going by Motor Cycle No. RJ - 01 - 14 M - 5220 from Kishangarh towards Ajmer. When they reached near Anand Hotel, a truck No. GJ-9Y-8676 being driven rashly, negligently and with excessive speed by its driver respondent No. 1, came and hit the motorcycle, and because of this hit, claimant-appellant sustained serious injuries.

3. It was also averred in the claim petition that at the time of accident, the appellant was 26 years of age. He, by working as Supervisor with Bhoomi Project Pvt. Ltd., Kishangarh, Ajmer was getting a monthly salary of Rs. 9500/-. He sustained serious injuries all over this body, specially on his right leg. Because of this crush injury on right leg, it was a imputed below the knee and there were fractures in his right femur and patella bones. He remained admitted in hospital from 25.1.2009 to 8.2.2009 where on 25.1.2009 and 31.1.2009, his operations were done. Even after discharge f











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top