SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Raj) 428

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
DINESH CHANDRA SOMANI, AJAY RASTOGI, JJ.
Laxmi Devi D/o Shri Jagan Singh - Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18808, 11990, 18802 of 2015
Decided on : 30-05-2017.

Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Mr.Abhishek Pareek, Ms.Shika Pareek, Advocates.
For the Respondents:Dr.A.S.Khangarot, Additional Advocate General.

Headnote:

Rajasthan Mines and Geological Subordinate Service Rules, 1960 - Rajasthan Police Subordinate Service Rules, 1989 - Rule 6 - Post of Constable - Maternity is indeed - Physical efficiency test - Whether a delay of two years in physical/efficiency test following written examination during which a woman candidate became pregnant would entitle to seek postponement of date of her physical efficiency examination or such date cannot be postponed to detriment and rejection of woman candidate - Writ Petition decided it has been held that time of conducting Physical Efficiency Test/Physical Standard Test be extended in giving her reasonable time of relaxation which could make her possible to participate in physical/efficiency test in the process of evaluating her merit for appointment on post of Constable - Writ Petitions have been referred by Single Judge on account of two conflicting views to be examined - Held, Once it is observed & held that maternity is a human right of a woman and so longer married woman is not disqualified from participating in selection process and is not an impediment and after having qualified written test at stage when she has to undergo Physical Standard Test/Physical Efficiency Test became pregnant with advanced stage and pregnancy being not a disability but one of natural consequence of marriage woman candidate deserves indulgence of qualifying physical standards after affording a reasonable time in attaining fitness which authority may consider to be appropriate keeping - Based on aforesaid discussion court are of view that there can be no conclusion other than to hold that action of respondents in not granting indulgence to petitioners in failing to qualify Physical Standard Test/Physical Efficiency Test because of their advanced stage of pregnancy is illegal and arbitrary and impugned provisions of Standing Orders to the extent they lay down that pregnancy would render a candidate unfit is legally not sustainable - Writ Petition allowed

JUDGMENT :

Ajay Rastogi, J.

1. These batch of writ petitions have been referred by the ld.Single Judge on account of two conflicting views to be examined by the Division Bench of this Court “Whether a delay of two years in the physical/efficiency test following the written examination during which a woman candidate became pregnant would entitle to seek postponement of the date of her physical efficiency examination or such date cannot be postponed to the detriment and rejection of the woman candidate.”

2. It reveals from the order passed by the ld.Single Judge dt.20.02.2017 that there are two conflicting judgments of the coordinate Single Bench of this Court on the issue under consideration while in the case of Soniya Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan & Another [S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.2537/2016] decided on 29.02.2016 it has been held that time of conducting Physical Efficiency Test/Physical Standard Test be extended in giving her reasonable time of relaxation which could make her possible to participate in the physical/efficiency test in the process of evaluating her merit for appointment on the post of Constable. However, prior thereto a contrary view was expressed by the coordinate Single Bench at the Principal Seat at Jodhpur in Suwa Panwar Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Others [S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6122/2011] decided on 23.08.2011 where it has been held that maternity is indeed a human right of a woman, having qualified written test for the post of Constable, the candidate being aware of the need to undergo physical efficiency test ought to have scheduled her pregnancy accordingly so that she could participate in the physical/efficiency test in the process of evaluating her merit for appointment on the post of Constable.

3. In examining the question raised for our consideration, we take note of the facts for proper appraisal of the matter with the consent of the parties from Writ Petition No.18808/2015.

4. The post of Constable Mineral Protection Force is included in the schedule appended to the Rajasthan Mines and Geological Subordinate Service Rules, 1960 to be filled by open selection and in another writ petition, the post of Constable is included in the Schedule appended to the Rajasthan Police Subordinate Service Rules, 1989 and one has to successfully qualify the Physical Efficiency Test/Physical Standard Test prescribed under the relevant service Rules apart from qualifying in the written examination as prescribed under the Rules of 1960/1989 respectively.

5. In the instant case, the post of Constable Mineral Protection Force came to be advertised vide notification dt.20.07.2013 and the eligible candidates including the petitioner submitted their online application and appeared in the written examination which was held on 15.09.2013 and the result of the written examination was declared on 01.10.2013 wherein the petitioner was declared successful. It may be relevant to note that after declaration of result on 01.10.2013 no information was transmitted about the further process to be held and on one fine morning a news item was published on 06.07.2014 to the effect that selections have been cancelled and the vacancies advertised ceased to exist and the participants left their hope about any further action being taken pursuant to advertisement dt.20.07.2013 and it was only on 22.04.2015, the candidates were apprised through a news item that posts are being included for selection of 14th Battalion RAC through Police Department and necessary amendment in the Rules, 1989 have been made vide Notification dt.20.04.2015.

6. The State Government vide notification dt.20.04.2015 enacted the Rajasthan Police Subordinate Service (Amendment) Rules, 2015 inserted a new proviso to the proviso to cl.(a) of R.6 of the Rules, 1989 which read ad infra:-

“2. Amendment of Rule 6- After the existing proviso to clause (a) of rule 6 of t
























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top