Ajay Rastogi, J.

1. These batch of writ petitions have been referred by the ld.Single Judge on account of two conflicting views to be examined by the Division Bench of this Court “Whether a delay of two years in the physical/efficiency test following the written examination during which a woman candidate became pregnant would entitle to seek postponement of the date of her physical efficiency examination or such date cannot be postponed to the detriment and rejection of the woman candidate.”

2. It reveals from the order passed by the ld.Single Judge dt.20.02.2017 that there are two conflicting judgments of the coordinate Single Bench of this Court on the issue under consideration while in the case of Soniya Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan & Another [S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.2537/2016] decided on 29.02.2016 it has been held that time of conducting Physical Efficiency Test/Physical Standard Test be extended in giving her reasonable time of relaxation which could make her possible to participate in the physical/efficiency test in the process of evaluating her merit for a