SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Raj) 442

MOHAMMAD RAFIQ, MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Liyakat S/o Fattu – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. Anuroop Singhi, Mr. Amitabh Jatav, Mr. Azad Ahmed and Mr. Rajesh Choudhary.
For the Respondent: Mr. R.S. Raghav.

JUDGMENT :

MOHAMMAD RAFIQ, J.

1. These appeals seek to challenge judgment and order dated 01.07.2014 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Tijara, District Alwar, in Sessions Case No. 50/2012, whereby learned trial court convicted and sentenced accused-appellants Liyakat, Kala @ Kallu @ Shesham and Afsar @ Afsa, as under:-

Accused-appellants

Conviction

Sentence

Liyakat (Appeal No. 868 of 2014)

 

Kala @ Kallu @ Shesham (Appeal No. 1016 of 2014)

 

Afsar @ Afsa (Appeal No. 344 of 2016)

Under Section 392 IPC

Each to undergo five years Rigorous Imprisonment with fine of Rs. 1000/- in default of payment of fine, each to further undergo one month’s rigorous imprisonment

Under Section 302 IPC

Each to undergo Life Imprisonment with fine of Rs. 2000/- in default of payment of fine, each to further undergo two months imprisonment

All the aforenoted sentences were ordered to run concurrently

2. Case of the prosecution is that one Ilyas Khan submitted a written report to the





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top