IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
BANWARILAAL, J.
Ratika wife of Sh. Abhishek Ojha & Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
State of Rajasthan Through P.P. & Ors. - Respondent
S.B.Criminal Misccellaneous (Petition) No. 3915 of 2016
Decided on : 12-05-2017
Abetment - Suicide - 306, 107, 109 IPC - 482 CrPC - 397 CrPC - 306, 107, 109, 155(2), 482, 397 - The judgment discusses the legal provisions related to abetment of suicide under sections 306, 107, 109 IPC, and the exercise of inherent powers under sections 482 and 397 CrPC. It also highlights the principles for exercising jurisdiction to prevent abuse of the process of any court or to secure the ends of justice. The court emphasizes the need for a prima facie case of abetment and the requirement of mens rea to convict a person under section 306 IPC. The judgment also addresses the distinction between civil wrong and criminal offence, the necessity of a positive act to instigate or aid in committing suicide, and the importance of considering only the averments made in the complaint or charge-sheet at the stage of taking cognizance of the offence.
Fact of the Case:
The case involves allegations of abetment of suicide under sections 306, 107, 109 IPC, and the exercise of inherent powers under sections 482 and 397 CrPC. The court analyzes the legal provisions and principles related to abetment of suicide, emphasizing the need for a prima facie case of abetment and the requirement of mens rea to convict a person under section 306 IPC. It also addresses the distinction between civil wrong and criminal offence, the necessity of a positive act to instigate or aid in committing suicide, and the importance of considering only the averments made in the complaint or charge-sheet at the stage of taking cognizance of the offence.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the allegations made in the FIR or complaint, even if taken at their face value and accepted in their entirety, did not prima-facie constitute any offence or make out a case against the accused. The court also emphasized the need for a prima facie case of abetment and the requirement of mens rea to convict a person under section 306 IPC. It further highlighted the importance of considering only the averments made in the complaint or charge-sheet at the stage of taking cognizance of the offence.
Issues: The key issues addressed in the judgment include the legal provisions related to abetment of suicide, the exercise of inherent powers under sections 482 and 397 CrPC, and the principles for exercising jurisdiction to prevent abuse of the process of any court or to secure the ends of justice. The court also examined the distinction between civil wrong and criminal offence, the necessity of a positive act to instigate or aid in committing suicide, and the importance of considering only the averments made in the complaint or charge-sheet at the stage of taking cognizance of the offence.
Ratio Decidendi: The ratio decidendi of the judgment revolves around the need for a prima facie case of abetment and the requirement of mens rea to convict a person under section 306 IPC. The court also emphasizes the importance of considering only the averments made in the complaint or charge-sheet at the stage of taking cognizance of the offence, and the exercise of inherent powers under sections 482 and 397 CrPC to prevent abuse of the process of any court or to secure the ends of justice.
Final Decision: The final decision of the court was to quash the charge under section 306 IPC and to emphasize the need for a prima facie case of abetment and the requirement of mens rea to convict a person under section 306 IPC. The court also highlighted the importance of considering only the averments made in the complaint or charge-sheet at the stage of taking cognizance of the offence, and the exercise of inherent powers under sections 482 and 397 CrPC to prevent abuse of the process of any court or to secure the ends of justice.
Banwarilaal, J.
;kphx.k vfHk;qDrx.k jfrdk] Jherh d`frdk rFkk MkW0 v'ouh lDlsuk us ;g ;kfpdk /kkjk 482 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds izko/kkuksa ds rgr izLrqr dj muds fo:) iqfyl Fkkuk 'kkL=huxj] t;iqj ¼mRrj½ esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 170@2016 ¼,usDlj&1½ vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 306 Hkk-na-la- ds vuqlj.k esa izLrqr pktZ'khV ,usDlj&5 ,oa pktZ'khV ij U;k;ky; vfrfjDr eq[; egkuxj eftLVªsV dze&11] t;iqj egkuxj }kjk ;kph vfHk;qDr v'ouh lDlsuk ds fo:) ikfjr izlaKku vkns'k fnukad 27-08-2016 ¼,usDlj&6½ vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 306 rFkk 120ch Hkk-na-la- ,oa ;kphx.k vfHk;qDrx.k jfrdk ,oa Jherh d`frdk ds fo:) ikfjr izlaKku vkns'k fnukad 26-10-2016 ¼,usDlj&7½ tks fd vkijkf/kd izdj.k la[;k 1261@2016 esa ikfjr fd;s x;s gaS] dks fujLr fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh gSA
izdj.k ds laf{kIr rF; bl izdkj gSa fd v;kph la[;k&2 ifjoknh vthr dqekj vks>k us fnukad 27-05-2016 dks iqfyl Fkkuk 'kkL=huxj] t;iqj ¼mRrj½ esa ,d fjiksVZ Fkkukf/kdkjh ds le{k bl vk'k; dh izLrqr dh fd&
^^fuosnu gS fd esjk yMdk vfHk"ksd vks>k MsfUVl FkkA ftldh futh Dyhfud >wysyky ekdsZV] >ksVokMk esa jta uk MsfUVy Dyhfud ds uke ls gSA esjs iq= dk fookg fnukad 22-02-2016 dks Jherh jfrdk ds lkFk fgUnw jhfr fjokt ls 'ks[kkokVh dsUnz t;iqj ls gqbZ FkhA Jherh jfrdk ds ifjokjtu ewy :i ls ujflagxat ftyk jktx< ¼e/;izns'k½ ds jgus okys gSaA jfrdk dh cMh cfgu d`frdk o mlds thtk vf'ou lDlsuk gSa ,oa mlds ekrk Jherh T;ksfr ,oa firk Jh mek'kadj tks'kh gSaA 'kknh ds ckn djhc ,d ekg gekjs ?kj lh&Ldhe esa gekjs lkFk o yMds ds lkFk jghA mlds ckn oks vius ihgj pyh xbZA ihgj tkus ls iwoZ jkstkuk esjs yMds ds lkFk >xMk djrh Fkh o >awBs ykaNu yxkdj >xMk djrh FkhA viuh futh thou dh ckrsa thtk dks crkdj esjs yMds dks izrkfMr djrh FkhA fnukad 14-04-2016 dks esjs yMds ds >ksVokMk fLFkr Dyhfud ij Hkh >awBs ykNa u yxkdj mlds lkFk >xMk fd;k ,oa esjs yMds dks lftZdy baLVªwesaV ls xys o gkFk ij xaHkhj pksV igaqpkdj tku ysus dh dksf'k'k dhA vfHk"ksd ds vius cpko ds nkSjku jfrdk ds Dyhfud ls Hkkxus ds nkSjku jfrdk ds Hkh pksV vkbZaA mu nksuksa dk bZykt geus nhi gkWLihVy] [kkrhiqjk jksM] >ksVokMk esa djok;kA ?kVuk dh tkudkjh jfrdk ds ifjokjtu dks nsus ij mlds firk] thtk ,oa cgu vkbZaA mu yksxksa ds lkeus nksuksa dk bZykt gqvk o bu yksxksa us ge ij ncko cukdj LVkEi ij jkthukek djus ds fy, dgk ysfdu jkthukek ikfjokfjd le>cw> ls ncko esa gks x;k o /kedh Hkh nh fd ;fn gekjs i{k esa c;ku ugha fy[ks rks ge vkids f[kykQ ngst dk dsl yxok;saxsA blds i'pkr oks vius ihgj pyh x;hA ihgj tkus ds i'pkr jkstkuk esjs csVs dks Qksu ij jfrdk o mlds thtk vf'ou ,oa cMh cgu d`frdk }kjk dsl esa Qalkus dh /kedh nsdj izrkfMr djuk 'kq: dj fn;kA o esjs iq= vfHk"ksd dks bruh ekufld ;kruk,a nh fd mls vkRegR;k djus ij etcwj dj fn;kA vkt budh ;krukvksa dh otg ls esjk iq= bl nqfu;k esa ugha jgkA buds f[kykQ l[r dkuwuh dk;Zokgh djus dh d`ik djsaA esjs iq= }kjk lqlkbZM uksV Hkh fy[k dj NksMk x;k gSA tks eSaus eyw gh lya Xu fd;k gSA ejs k iq= esjs fe= ds ?kj lqHkk"k dkWyksuh 'kkL=huxj esa edku ua- 111 esa vk;k gqvk Fkk] ogh ij mlus vkRegR;k dj yhA^^
mDr fjiksVZ ij iqfyl Fkkuk 'kkL=huxj] t;iqj esa izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 170@2016 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 306 Hkk-na-la- esa ntZ dj vuqla/kku izkjEHk fd;k x;kA ckn vuqla/kku fo}ku v/khuLFk U;k;ky; vij eq[; egkuxj eftLVªsV dze&11] t;iqj egkuxj esa ;kph vfHk;qDr v'ojh lDlsuk ds fo:) /kkjk 306 Hkk-na-la- lifBr /kkjk 120ch Hkk-na-la- ds vijk/k esa fnukad 27-08-2016 dks vkjksi i= is'k fd;k] ftl ij v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us mijksDr /kkjkvksa esa izlaKku ysdj vuU; :i ls ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k }kjk fopkj.kh; gksus ds dkj.k izdj.k dks mlh jkst /kkjk 209 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds izko/kkuksa ds rgr ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k] t;iqj egkuxj dks dfeV dj fn;kA rRi'pkr fnukad 26-10-2016 dks iqu% frrEck pktZ'khV ;kphx.k vfHk;qDrx.k jfrdk rFkk Jherh d`frdk ds fo:) /kkjk 306] 120ch Hkk-na-la- ds vijk/k esa is'k dh] ftl ij Hkh fo}ku v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us fnukad 26-10-2016 dks mijksDr /kkjkvksa esa izlaKku ysdj dehVy cgl ds fy, fnukad 04-11-2016 dks fu;r dhA izdj.k orZeku esa vij ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k] dze&16] t;iqj egkuxj esa fopkjk/khu gSA
fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kphx.k Jh vj
Amit Kapoor vs. Ramesh Chander and Another
Ashok Chaturvedi and Others vs. Shitul H. Chanchani and another
Devender Singh Vs. State of Haryana 2009 (16) SCC 396
Gurucharan Singh vs. State of Punjab
Police, Velmurugan and Anr. vs. State, Represented by the Deputy Superintendent of Police
Ramesh Kumar vs. State of Chhattishgarh
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.