SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Raj) 688

IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH
Mahesh Chandra Sharma, J.
National Insurance Co Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Smt. Narayani and Ors. – Respondents
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2615 of 2005
Decided On : 07-02-2017

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Deepak Goyal, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Mukesh Kr. Goyal, Advocate.

Headnote:

Constitution of india,1950 - Accident - Jurisdiction and contrary - Agreement with findings - Appeal has been filed against impugned judgment and award passed by Judge of the case are that with regard to accident a claim petition was filed on behalf of claimant/s claiming compensation as mentioned - Notices were issued to opposite parties - Reply to claim petition was filed and Tribunal framed issues - After hearing all parties Tribunal passed aforesaid impugned award - Against impugned award insurance company has preferred instant appeal for relief as prayed for in it - Held, Case and findings arrived at by Tribunal as quoted herein above Tribunal is found to have dealt with each and every aspect of matter and has rightly passed impugned judgment and award - Court am in unison with findings arrived at by Tribunal - Hence court do not think it just and proper to interfere with impugned award passed Tribunal and thus appeal having no force is hereby dismissed after confirming judgment and award passed by Tribunal - Appeal Dismissed

JUDGMENT :

Mahesh Chandra Sharma, J.

The instant appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment and award passed by the Judge, MACT.

2. Brief facts of the case are that with regard to the accident, a claim petition was filed on behalf of the claimant/s claiming compensation as mentioned wherein.

3. Notices were issued to the opposite parties. Reply to the claim petition was filed and the learned Tribunal framed the issues. After hearing all the parties, the learned Tribunal passed the aforesaid impugned award.

Against the impugned award, the insurance company has preferred the instant appeal for the relief as prayed for in it.

4. Learned counsel for the insurance company has contended that the learned Tribunal has failed to appreciate each and every aspect of the matter as also the evidence available on record. The award passed by the learned Tribunal is illegal, without jurisdiction and contrary to the facts of the case. Hence impugned award deserves to be set aside.

5. On the contrary, learned counsel for the respondents defended the impugned judgment and award and stated the same to be just and proper.

6. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and carefully perused the impugned judgment and award. I am in agreement with the findings arrived at by the learned Tribunal on issue no.1 & 4 which read as under :

okn fcUnq la0 1 o 2

6- bu nksuksa gh okn fcUnqvksa dks lkfcr djus dk Hkkj vkosndx.k ij gSA vkosnd la0 1 dh nkSjkus izdj.k ds fuLrkj.k dk;Zokgh e`R;q gks x;hA ysfdu mldh lk{; ,0M0 1 jkes'oj izlkn dh ys[kc) dh x;h gSaA mlus vius c;ku esa ;g dgk gS fd mlds yM+ds fouksn dqekj dh djhc <+kbZ lky igys lM+d nq?kZVuk esa e`R;q gks x;hA og vk;qosZn gkWLihVy esa dEikmaMj FkkA mlds nks yM+fd;kWa gSA og o mldh iRuh fouksn dqekj ds lkFk gh jgrs FksA fouksn dh iRuh nq?kZVuk ls djhc rhu lky igys rykd ns pqdh FkhA tks rykd ds ckn vyx jgrh gSA cPps mlds lkFk jgrs gSaA mlus viuh lk{; ls ,Q0vkbZ0vkj0 izn'kZ0 1] pktZ'khV izn'kZ0 2] uD'kk ekSdk izn'kZ0 3] eSdsfudy eqvk;uk izn'kZ0 4] nj] lqiqnZxh izn'kZ0 5] 'kiFk i= izn'kZ0 6] QnZ tIrh izn'kZ0 7] uksfVl 134 izn'kZ0 8] QnZ fxjQ~rkjh izn'kZ0 9] i= izn'kZ 10] lqiqnZxhukek izn'kZ0 11] bUV~ksxs'ku fjiksVZ izn'kZ0 12] jftLV~s'ku izn'kZ0 13] chek doj uksV izn'kZ0 14] iksLVekVZe fjiksVZ izn'kZ0 15] c;ku dq0 dud izn'kZ0 17] osru izek.k i= izn'kZ0 16] c;ku fjrq izn'kZ0 18 o lwph izn'kZ0 19 dks iznf'kZr djok;kA mlus viuh ftjg esa ;g dgk gS fd mlds rhu yM+ds vkSj gSA ftuds uke v'kksd dqekj] jktsUnz dqekj o ohjsUnz dqekj gSaA mlds rhuksa yM+ds ukSdjh djrs gSaA fdruh&fdruh ru[okg feyrh gS] ;g ugha crk ldrkA

,0M0 2 jktho ikjk'kj us vius c;ku esa dgk gS fd og fouksn dqekj dks tkurk gS] ftudh <+kbZ lky igys nq?kZVuk esa e`R;q gq;h FkhA og Hkh mldh cgu dud] fouksn dqekj o vU; dbZ yksx djkSyh ls dSyk nsoh iSny ;k=k esa tk jgs FksA jkr ds ,d&Ms<+ cts ekepkjh ds ikl iqfy;k dh ckr gSA ;g yksx viuh lkbZM esa py jgs FksA ihNs ls VkVk lweks la[;k ;w0ih0 80@ih0 861 ygjkrh gq;h rsth ls vk;h vkSj fouksn ds Vddj ekj nhA fouksn ogha ij fxj iM+kA mls ysdj vLirky vk;s] tgkWa ls mls ,l0,e0,e0] vLirky] t;iqj ys x;sA ogkWa ij fouksn dqekj dh nq?kZVuk esa vk;h pksVksa ds dkj.k e`R;q gks x;hA viuh ftjg esa mlus dgk fd og fouksn dqekj ds ifjokj esa fdlh dks ugha tkurkA xkM+h dk uEcj mlus ns[k fy;k Fkk] mlus xkM+h dk uEcj crk;k] ysfdu fdl ifjokj okys dks uEcj crk;k Fkk] mls /;ku ughaA mlds vuqlkj xkM+h dk jax lQsn FkkA

7- mijksDr lk{; ds lUnHkZ esa izys[kh; lk{; dk voyksdu fd;k x;k] ftlesa izn'kZ0 1 ?kVuk dh izFke lwpuk gS] ftl ij fd izdj.k la[;k 346@2001 ntZ fd;k x;kA izn'kZ0 2 ckn vUos"k.k vfHk;ksx i= is'k gqvk gS] ftlesa fd foi{kh la0 2 dh xyrh ik;h x;h vkSj mlds fo:) /kkjk 304,] 279 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk esa is'k gq;h gS vkSj izn'kZ0 3 uD'kk ekSdk gSA izn'kZ0 13 nq?kZVuk esa fyIr okgu dk jftLVs~'ku izek.k i= gS] ftlds vuqlkj foi{kh la0 1 mDr okgu dh iathd`r Lokfeuh gS rFkk izn'kZ] 8 ,e0oh0,DV ds vUrxZr foi{kh la0 1 dks tks uksfVl fn;k x;k gS] mlesa mlus ;g crk;k gS fd okgu VkVk lweks la[;k ;w0ih0 80@Vh0 861 mlds LokfeRo dh gS rFkk f













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top