Jainendra Kumar Ranka, J.

In all the Civil Second Appeals, identical questions have been raised by the appellants and are directed against the orders dated 29.03.2007, 26.02.1996, 24.11.1998, 01.02.2003 & 01.2.2003 passed by the Additional District Judge No.6, Jaipur City, Jaipur, Additional District Judge No.5, Jaipur City, Jaipur, Additional District Judge No.6, Jaipur City, Jaipur, Additional District Judge No.4, Jaipur City, Jaipur & Additional District Judge No.4, Jaipur City, Jaipur. In all the appeals, the question posed is as to whether in these cases, the Civil Court had jurisdiction to entertain and try the civil suit or as to whether the nature of dispute being such, it is required to be considered under the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947. Therefore, all these appeals with the consent of counsels are being decided by this common order. The facts of the leading case bearing S.B. Civil Second Appeal No.597 of 2007 are taken into consideration.

2. The brief facts noticed are that the appellant is a Government of Rajasthan undertaking and the respondent-plaintiff was an employee of the Appellants and has preferred a suit for declaration of termination from service as inva