2017 Supreme(Raj) 941
IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH
Mahesh Chandra Sharma, J.
National Insurance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Smt Sunita and Ors. – Respondents
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 952 of 2006
Decided On : 07-04-2017
For the Appellant :Ms. Raj Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. B.S. Rajawat, Advocate.
Headnote:
Constitution of India,1950 – accident – Claim of Compensation - Appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment and award under appeal case are that an accident occurred in the present case and with regard to an accident, a claim petition was filed on behalf of the claimant/s claiming compensation as mentioned therein. Notices were issued to the opposite parties. Reply to the claim petition was filed and the learned Tribunal framed the issues. After hearing all the parties, the learned Tribunal passed the aforesaid impugned judgment & award under appeal - Against the impugned judgment and award under appeal, the appellant preferred the instant appeal for the relief as prayed for in it – Held, Appellant has contended that the learned Tribunal has failed to appreciate each and every aspect of the matter as also the evidence available on record. The award passed by the learned Tribunal is illegal, without jurisdiction and contrary to the facts of the case. Hence impugned award deserves to be modified/enhanced - On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents has opposed the submissions advanced on behalf of appellant and requested for maintaining/setting aside of award - I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned judgment and award under appeal. I am in agreement with the findings arrived at by the learned Tribunal - appeal dismissed.
Mahesh Chandra Sharma, J.
This appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment and award under appeal.
Brief facts of the case are that an accident occurred in the present case and with regard to an accident, a claim petition was filed on behalf of the claimant/s claiming compensation as mentioned therein. Notices were issued to the opposite parties. Reply to the claim petition was filed and the learned Tribunal framed the issues. After hearing all the parties, the learned Tribunal passed the aforesaid impugned judgment & award under appeal.
2. Against the impugned judgment and award under appeal, the appellant preferred the instant appeal for the relief as prayed for in it.
3. Learned counsel for the appellant has contended that the learned Tribunal has failed to appreciate each and every aspect of the matter as also the evidence available on record. The award passed by the learned Tribunal is illegal, without jurisdiction and contrary to the facts of the case. Hence impugned award deserves to be modified/enhanced.
4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents has opposed the submissions advanced on behalf of appellant and requested for maintaining/setting aside of award.
5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned judgment and award under appeal. I am in agreement with the findings arrived at by the learned Tribunal, which are reproduced as under:-
rudh la[;k 1 o 4 %&
rudh la0 1 o 4 dk fofu'p; ,oa lkFk djuk U;k;ksfpr ikrs gSA D;ksafd rudh la0 1 ds fofu'p; ds fy, eq[; :i ls ;g ns[kuk gS fd vk;k iwj.key dh e`R;q okgu nq?kZVuk ds dkj.k gqbZ vkSj rudh la[;k&4 ds fofu'p; ds fy, ;g ns[kuk gS fd vk;k iwj.key dh e`R;q nq?kZVuk ls uk gksdj LokHkkfod :i ls vpkud rfc;r [kjkc gks tkus ds dkj.k gqbZ\ ;gka ;g Hkh Li"V fd;k tkrk gS fd rudh la[;k&1 dks fl) djus dk Hkkj izkFkhZ i{k ij gSa ,oa rudh la[;k&4 dks fl) djus dk Hkkj vizkFkhZ la0 4 chek dEiuh ij gSA----------------
vizkFkhZ la0 4 dh vksj ls ;g Hkh mtz fy;k x;k gS fd jftLVMZ vkWuj tks fd izn'kZ&11 ds vuqlkj jkepUnz gS] dks i{kdkj ugha cuk;k x;k gSA bl dkj.k ls Hkh Dyse pyus ;ksX; ugha gSA vizkFkhZ la0 1 o 2 ds tokc dks ns[kk x;kA izn'kZ&9 ij xkSj fd;k x;kA uksfVl /kkjk 133 ,e0oh0 ,DV tks thriky eh.kk dks fn;k x;k gS] ftlus blh nLrkost esa vius vkidks ^^vksQsf.Max Oghdy** dk ekfyd eqrkfcd ikoj vkWQ vVkuhZ crk;k gS rFkk vius tokc esa Hkh bl U;k;kf/kdj.k ds le{k ,slk tokc is'k ugha fd;k fd og VSEiksa dk Lokeh ugha gSA fQj izn'kZ&11 dks ns[kus ls tkfgj gS fd VSEeksa dk okLrfod ekfyd thriky gSA chek dEiuh Lo;a }kjk tks chek dWojuksV bl VSEiksa ds chek ckcr tkjh fd;k x;k gS mlesa okgu Lokeh dk uke thriky eh.kk gh vafdr gSA ,sls esa ;g nyhy xyr gS fd okgu ds okLrfod ekfyd dks i{kdkj ugha cuk;k x;kA--------------
mijksDr leLr foospu o fu"d"kZ ls ,slk ugha ekuk tk ldrk fd ^^vksQsf.Mx okgu** VSEiksa la[;k vkj0ts0 14 ih0 0028 bl nq?kZVuk esa fyIr uk jgk gks vkSj e`rd iwj.key dh e`R;q nq?kZVuk ls uk gksdj LokHkkfod :i ls vpkud rfc;r [kjkc gks tkus ds dkj.k gqbZ gksA cfYd le; foospu] lk{; ds fo'ys"k.k ds vk/kkj ij izkFkhZx.k ;g fl) djus esa lQy jgs gSa fd fnukad 11-05-2002 dks izkr% 10%30 cts vizkFkhZ la0 1 VSEiksa pkyd us] VSEiksa la[;k% vkj0ts0 14 ih0 0028 dks xQyr o ykijokgh ls pykdj fnYyh ckbZikl jksM+] [kksys ds guqekuth ds ikl vpkud czsd yxk fn;s ftlls e`rd iwj.key VSEiksa ls fxj x;k vkSj mlds 'kjhj ij xaHkhj o lk/kkj.k pksVsa vkbZ vkSj ,l0,e0,l0 vLirky esa mldh e`R;q gks xbZA nq?kZVuk esa fyIr okgu dk Lokeh vizkFkhZ la0 2 gS ,oa oDr nq?kZVuk ;g VSEiksa vizkFkhZ la0 4 ds ;gka chfer FkkA
23- vr% rudh la[;k 1 izkFkhZx.k ds i{k esa ,oa vizkFkhZx.k ds fo:) r; dh tkrh gSA mijksDr foospu ,oa fu"d"kZ ds vk/kkj ij rudh la[;k 4 vizkFkhZ la0 4 ds fo:) ,oa izkFkhZx.k ds i{k esa fuf.kZr dh tkrh gSA
rudh la[;k&2
bl rudh dks fl) djus dk Hkkj izkFkhZ i{k ij gSA izkFkhZ i{ki ds vuqlkj e`rd dh vk;q 26 o"kZ nq?kZVuk ds le; FkhA ;g ljdkjh v/;kid ds in ij fu;qfDr FkkA mldk ekfld osru izn'kZ&18 ds vuqlkj dqy 6]585@& :i;s FkkA vr% leqfpr {kfriwfrZ jkf'k iznku d