SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Raj) 1050

VIJAY BISHNOI
State of Rajasthan – Appellant
Versus
Naraian Lal son of Amar Chand Khatik – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. O.P. Rathi, PP.
For the Respondent:Mr. S.S. Shaktawat, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

Vijay Bishnoi, J. - These criminal appeals have been preferred on behalf of the appellant - State being aggrieved with the judgment dated 21.4.2016 passed by the Special Judge (POCSO Act) Cases, Chittorgarh (for short 'the trial court') in Sessions Case No.155/2014, whereby the trial court while acquitting the accused respondent for the offences punishable under Section 3/4 read with Section 18 of the POCSO Act and in alternative Section 376(2) read with Section 511 IPC has convicted him for the offence punishable under Section 354 IPC and sentenced him for one year's rigorous imprisonment and imposed a fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo one month's rigorous imprisonment.

2. The appellant - State has filed S.B. CriminAppeal No.681/2016 against the judgment of acquittal of the accused respondent for the offences punishable under Section 3/4 read with Section 18 of the POCSO Act and in alternative Section 376(2) read with Section 511 IPC and S.B. Criminal Appeal No.520/2016 has been filed for enhancement of sentence awarded by the trial court to the accused respondent for the offence punishable under Section 354 IPC.

3. Learned Public Prosecu


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top