PRAKASH GUPTA
Mushtaq Ahmed S/o Shri Ali Baksh – Appellant
Versus
Mohd. Akhtar – Respondent
Prakash Gupta, J.
1. The instant Civil Second Appeal under Section 100 CPC has been filed by the appellants aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 30.9.1999 passed by learned Addl. District Judge No.9, Jaipur City, Jaipur (hereinafter referred to as the 'appellate court') in Civil Regular Appeal No.54/1999 whereby the 'appellate court' has quashed and set aside the judgment and decree dated 19.03.1987 passed by the learned Civil Judge No.5, Jaipur City (hereinafter referred to as the 'trial court') and decreed the civil suit filed by the plaintiffs against the defendants for declaration of the sale-deed dated 6.9.1968 as null and void, possession of the property etc.
2. The facts in brief for the purpose of deciding the appeal are that plaintiffs-original respondents No.1 to 4 filed a suit for declaration, seeking possession and injunction for the disputed property i.e. shop.
3. The case of the plaintiffs before the trial court was that the disputed property i.e. a shop described in para of the plaint was gifted by Ms. Bashiram W/o Abdul Samad, defendant No.1 (since dead) and Abdul Rehman son of Ellahibux to the father of the plaintiffs Mohd. Ibrahim vide the gift deed d
Abdul Rahim & Ors. v. S.K. Abdul Zabar & Ors.
Gopal Krishnaji Ketkar v. Mohamed Haji Latif & Ors.
Gulamhussain Kutubuddin Maner v. Abdulrashid Abdulrajak Maner & Ors. (2000) 8 SCC 507
Mahboob Sahab v. Syed Ismail & Ors.
Moran Mar Basselios Catholicos v. Thukalan Paulo Avira & Ors.
Valia Peedikakandi Kutheessa Umma & Ors. v. Pathakkalan Narayanath Kumhamu (deceased) & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.