SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Raj) 1877

IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH
Banwari Lal Sharma, J.
Mohammed Ashraf, S/o Shri Mohammed Sharief - Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, through the Govt. Advocate and Ors. - Respondent
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1266 of 2010
Decided On : 21-12-2016

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Piyush Sharma
For the Respondent: Mr. Anil Yadav

The court held that the petitioner's act of issuing a notice and filing a criminal complaint did not constitute cheating or extortion, and that the initiation of criminal proceedings on the same allegations pending before a civil court amounted to an abuse of the process of law.

Headnote:

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE - SECTION 482 - QUASHING OF FIR - CHEATING - EXTORTION - BLANK CHEQUE - ABUSE OF PROCESS OF LAW - CIVIL WRONG - CRIMINAL OFFENCE - ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS - MALICIOUS INITIATION OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS - QUASHING OF FIR AND SUBSEQUENT INVESTIGATION AND PROCEEDINGS.

Fact of the Case:

Petitioner-accused Mohammed Ashraf challenged an FIR registered against him for alleged offences under Sections 420 and 384 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) (later expanded to include Sections 467, 468, and 471 during the investigation). The complainant alleged that the petitioner had fraudulently obtained a signed cheque from him and later issued a notice and filed a criminal complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the basic ingredients of Section 415 of the IPC, namely, fraudulently or dishonestly inducing someone to deliver property, were missing in this case. The court also held that the act of the petitioner in issuing a notice and filing a criminal complaint before the court of law did not constitute extortion under Section 383 of the IPC, as the complainant was working with the person who allegedly gave the cheque to the petitioner and could have lodged a false report in connivance with him.

Issues: 1. Whether the petitioner's act of issuing a notice and filing a criminal complaint constituted cheating under Section 415 of the IPC? 2. Whether the petitioner's act constituted extortion under Section 383 of the IPC?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court relied on the definition of cheating under Section 415 of the IPC and held that the basic ingredients of fraudulently or dishonestly inducing someone to deliver property were missing in this case. The court also noted that the complainant had not reported the incident to anyone until after the petitioner served a notice on the person who allegedly gave the cheque. 2. The court relied on the definition of extortion under Section 383 of the IPC and held that the petitioner's act of issuing a notice and filing a criminal complaint did not constitute extortion, as the complainant was working with the person who allegedly gave the cheque to the petitioner and could have lodged a false report in connivance with him.

Final Decision: The court allowed the petition and quashed the FIR, subsequent investigation, and proceedings against the petitioner.

JUDGMENT AND ORDER :

Banwari Lal Sharma, J.

Matter came up on IA No. 5462/2016 for permission of filing charge sheet against accused petitioner in light of order dated 19.07.2010 but with the consent of learned counsel for the petitioner and learned PP, the matter is heard finally at this stage.

2. Petitioner-accused Mohammed Ashraf has preferred this misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing FIR No. 150/2010 registered at Police Station Ramganj Mandi, District Kota and all further investigation and proceedings therein against the petitioner for alleged offences under Sections 420 and 384 of IPC (Section 467, 468 and 471 IPC added by Police during investigation).

3. The brief facts of the case are that respondent no. 2-complainant victim submitted a written report addressing to Deputy Superintendent of Police, Ramganj Mandi Kota stating therein that :-

^^;g fd izkFkhZ lqHkk"k dksyksuh jkexateaMh dk jgus okyk gS izkFkhZ us dLck lqdsr esa vCnqy jtkd oYn vCnqy 'kdqj fuoklh lqdsr ds ;gka 10&12 o"kZ rd ukSdjh dh FkhA budh nks QesZa Fkh ,d QeZ vkj0ds0 LVksu b.MLVªht lqdsr ftlds izksijkbZVj vCnqy jtkd Fks ,oa ,d QeZ vkj0ds0 LVksu lIyk;lZ ftldk izks0 vCnqy [kkfyd oYn vCnqy jtkd fuoklh lqdsr FksA

2- ;g fd mDr nksuksa QeksaZ ij izkFkhZ ukSdjh djrk Fkk blfy, mDr nksuksa QeksaZ ds isilZ pSd cqd ysVj isM vkfn izkFkhZ ds ikl gh jgrs FksA D;ksafd cSadksa dk ,oa lsy VSDl bude VSDl foHkkx dk lkjk dk;Z izkFkhZ gh djrk FkkA

3- ;g fd izkFkhZ us djhc 3 o"kZ igys mDr QeksaZ ds ;gka ls ukSdjh NksM+ nh o vU; txg d`f"k miteaMh esa ukSdjh dj yh mlds ckn ogka ls Hkh izkFkhZ us ukSdjh NksM+ nh ,oa djhc 2&3 eghuksa ls fnYyh okds xxZ lkgc dh QSDVªh ij dk;Z dj jgk gSA ;g QSDVªh fnYyh okys lsB us eksgEen v'kjQ oYn eksgEen 'kjhQ tkfr eqlyeku fuoklh cktkj ua0 2 jkexateaMh ls fdjk;s ij ys j[kh gSA ogka QSDVªh ij eksgEen v'kjQ dk vkuk tkuk gS ,oa ikl esa ,d vU; QSDVªh eksgEen v'kjQ dh fLFkr gS ogka Hkh eksgEen v'kjQ vkrk tkrk jgrk gSA izkFkhZ dh eksgEen v'kjQ dh vPNh tku igpku gks x;h bl nkSjku izkFkhZ ds ikl ,d iqjkuh QkbZy tks lsy VSDl ,oa bude VSDl ds odhy lkgc inepUn th tSu ds ogka ls izkFkhZ ysdj vk;k FkkA mlesa vU; isij ds lkFk QeZ ds ysVj isM ,oa [kkyh pSd la[;k 485249 cSad vkWQ cMkSnk 'kk[kk jkexateaMh dk pSd Hkh izkFkhZ ds ikl vk;k Fkk ftl ij vCnqy [kkfyd ds gLrk{kj ek= FksA tks izkFkhZ us mDr QkbZy o i=koyh ds lkFk gh vius ikl gh j[k j[kk FkkA

4- ;g fd djhc 15 fnu igys izkFkhZ ls eks0 v'kjQ us iwNk fd igys rqe vCnqy jtkd ,oa vCnqy [kkfyd ds ;gka ukSdjh djrs FksA mDr QeksaZ ds lHkh dk;Z rqEgh djrs FksA bl ij izkFkhZ us eksgEen v'kjQ dks lkjh ckrsa crk nha ,oa izkFkhZ ds ikl lsy VSDl ds odhy lkgc ds ikl ls vkbZ QkbZy ,oa pSd dk Hkh gokyk fn;k o izkFkhZ us dgk fd eSaus ogka ls ukSdjh NksM+ nh ijUrq esjs ikl vkj- ds LVksu lIyk;lZ dk ,d pSd la[;k 485249 j[kk gqvk gSA bl ij eksgEen v'kjQ us dgk fd mDr pSd rqe eq>s ns nks bl ij izkFkhZ us mDr pSd eks0 v'kjQ dks nsus ls budkj dj fn;k blds ckn eks0 v'kjQ us eq> izkFkhZ dks /kksal nsdj Mjk /kedk dj tku ls ekjus dh /kedh nsdj mDr pSd esjs ls ys fy;kA

5- ;g fd mlds ckn eksgEen v'kjQ us mDr pSd ftl ij dsoy vCnqy [kkfyd ds gLrk{kj FksA mDr [kkyh pSd esa 3]50]000@& :i;s ek= jkf'k Hkjdj mDr pSd iatkc us'kuy cSad 'kk[kk jkexateaMh esa yxk fn;k tks [kkrk can gksus dh otg ls fMl vkWuj gks x;kA bl ckr dh tkudkjh cMkSnk cSad jkexateaMh us VsyhQksu ij vCnqy [kkfyd dks nh rc vCnqy [kfkyd us izkFkhZ ls Nkuchu dh rks lkjh ckr lkeus vk;hA

6- ;g fd mDr pSd lu~ 2000 dh pSd cqd dk Fkk mDr [kkrk fnukad 07-04-2005 dks gh can gks pqdk FkkA mlds ckn rks dbZ pSd cqd mDr cSad ls tkjh gks pqdh FkhA ijUrq ;g iqjkuk pSd ,d iznw"k.k dh QkbZy tks lsy VSDl o badeVSDl odhy lkgc ds ;gka ls vk;h FkhA mldks izkFkhZ us vius ikl j[k j[kk FkkA ftls izkFkhZ dks /kksal nsdj mldk nq:i;ksx djus ,oa QthZ nLrkost rS;kj dj mlesa 3]50]000@& :i;s dh jkf'k Hkjdj pSd dh jde gkfly djus dh uh;r ls eksgEen v'kjQ us mDr QthZ nLrkost rS;kj djds cSad esa yxk;k gSA

7- ;g fd bl izdkj eksgEen v'kjQ us tku cw>dj ;g tkurs gq, fd esjh dksbZ jde vCnqy [kkfyd ls ugha ysuh

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top