SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Raj) 1812

IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH
Mahesh Chandra Sharma, J.
Reliance General Insurance Company Limited - Appellant
Versus
Hari Dutt Sharma S/o Nand Kishore Sharma and Ors. - Respondent
S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 835 of 2016
Decided On : 01-12-2016

Advocates Appeared:
For the Insurance company : Mr. Rizwan Ahmed
For the Respondents: Mr. Prakash Thakuriya

Headnote:

Regular Appeal - Claim petition - Compensation - Insurance Company has preferred the instant appeal - Notices were issued to the opposite parties - Reply to the claim petition was filed and the learned Tribunal framed the issues - After hearing all the parties, the learned Tribunal passed the aforesaid impugned award - Held, Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and the findings arrived at by learned Tribunal as quoted herein above, the learned Tribunal is found to have dealt with each and every aspect of the matter, and has rightly passed the impugned judgment and award - Court is in unison with the findings arrived at by the learned Tribunal - Hence, Court does not think it just and proper to interfere with the impugned award passed by the Tribunal, and thus the appeal filed by the Insurance Co. is hereby dismissed after confirming the judgment and award passed by the learned Tribunal - Appeal dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

Mahesh Chandra Sharma, J.

This appeal have been filed against the impugned judgment and award passed by the Judge, MACT.

2. Brief facts of the case are that with regard to the accident, a claim petition was filed on behalf of the claimants claiming compensation as mentioned wherein.

3. Notices were issued to the opposite parties. Reply to the claim petition was filed and the learned Tribunal framed the issues. After hearing all the parties, the learned Tribunal passed the aforesaid impugned award. Against the impugned award, the insurance company has preferred the instant appeal for the relief as prayed for.

4. Learned counsel for the insurance company has contended that the learned Tribunal has failed to appreciate each and every aspect of the matter as also the evidence available on record. The award passed by the learned Tribunal is illegal, and contrary to the facts of the case. Hence impugned award deserves to be set aside.

5. On the other hand, learned counsel for the claimants has defended the impugned judgment and award and stated the same to be just and proper.

6. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned judgment and award. I am in agreement with the findings arrived at by the learned Tribunal on issue no.3 which is reproduced as under:

^^bl fook|d dks lkfcr djus dk Hkkj vizkFkhZ la[;k 3 chek dEiuh ij FkkA bl laca/k esa chek dEiuh dh vksj ls ,u0,0MCY;w0 1 fodkl tknkSu dks ijhf{kr djok;k x;k gS] ftlus vius 'kiFk i= esa dFku fd;k gS fd okgu Vcsjk la[;k Mh0,y0 5 lh0bZ0 0481 dk chek okgu ekfyd iadt 'kekZ vizkFkhZ la[;k 1 ds uke ls izkbZosV dkj ds :i esa fd;k x;k gS] mDr okgu dks pykus ds fy, ykbZV eksVj Oghdy dk MªkbZfoax ykbZlsal gksuk vko';d gS bl laca/k esa chek dEiuh ds vf/koDrk }kjk okgu pkyd ds MªkbZfoax ykbZlsal ds ckcr chek/kkjh dks jftLVªMZ uksfVl fn;k x;k] blds ckotwn chfer rFkk dfFkr MªkbZoj us dfFkr nq?kZVuk ds oDr ykbZV eksVj Oghdy dk oS| ,oa izHkkoh ykbZlsal dh dksbZ izfr miyC/k ugha djokbZA blls Li"V gS fd nq?kZVuk ds oDr vizkFkhZ la[;k 2 ds ikl mDr okgu dks pykus dk oS| ,oa izHkkoh ykbZlsal ugha Fkk] ,slh fLFkfr esa chek 'krksZa dk mYya?ku gksus ds dkj.k chek dEiuh dk dksbZ nkf;Ro ugha curk gSA vius 'kiFk i= ds leFkZu esa lk{kh us chek ikWfylh izn'kZ ,u0,0 1] uksfVl dh izfr izn'kZ ,u0,0 2] jftLVªh dh jlhn izn'kZ ,u0,0 3 is'k dh gS ,oa izfrijh{kk esa dFku fd;k gS fd eSaus uksfVl izkfIr dh dksbZ ,0Mh0 is'k ugha dh gS] eq>s tkudkjh ugha gS fd U;k;ky; i=koyh ij vizkFkhZ la[;k& 1 o 2 dh ,di{kh; dk;Zokgh gks pqdh gksA izn'kZ 13 iBuh; ugha gSA eSa ugha crk ldrk fd izn'kZ 13 Mh0,y0 oS| ;k izHkkoh gksA izn'kZ 13 dh geus dksbZ tk¡p ugha djokbZA ;g dguk xyr gS fd izn'kZ 13 oS| ,oa izHkkoh gS] D;ksafd ;g iBuh; ugha gSA izn'kZ 13 dks ns[kdj dgk fd ml ij latho uke fy[kk gqvk gSA jftLVsª'ku uEcj iBuh; ugha gSA izn'kZ 13 ij irk vk/kk gh iBuh; gSA U;k;ky; i=koyh ds 'kh"kZd esa vafdr pkyd ds irs ij lacaf/kr vkj0Vh0vks0 dk;kZy; ls pkyd ds Mh0,y0 dh tkap ugha djokbZA geus fnYyh ds fdlh vkj0Vh0vks0 vkWfQl ls tkap ugha djokbZA

chek dEiuh ds lq;ksX; fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd Jh vkuUnc/kZu vxzoky dk rdZ jgk gS fd nq?kZVuk okgu Vcsjk la[;k Mh0,y0 5 lh0bZ0 0481 ls gksuk crk;k x;k gS rFkk oDr nq?kZVuk vizkFkhZ la[;k 2 dks mDr okgu ij pkyd gksuk crk;k gS] ijUrq i=koyh ij miyC/k okgu pkyd ds MªkbZfoax ykbZlsal dh izekf.kr izfr viBuh; gS] ftlds laca/k esa chek dEiuh ds vf/koDrk }kjk okgu ekfyd dks jftLVªMZ uksfVl fn;k x;k] tks izn'kZ ,u0,0 2 jgk gS] ftldh jlhn izn'kZ ,u0,0 3 o 4 jgh gS] ysfdu uksfVl izkIr gksus ds ckotwn chek /kkjh ds }kjk okgu pkyd dss MªkbZfoax ykbZlsal dh iBuh; izfr miyC/k ugha djokbZ xbZ] ftlls Li"V gS fd nq?kZVuk ds oDr vizkFkhZ la[;k&2 okgu pkyd ds ikl rFkkdfFkr okgu Vcsjk dks pykus dk oS| ,oa izHkkoh MªkbZfoax ykbZlsal ugha Fkk] ,slh fLFkfr esa chek ikWfylh dh 'krksZa dk Li"V mYya?ku gksus ds dkj.k chek dEiuh mDr nq?kZVuk ds fy, ftEesnkj ugha gSA

blds foijhr izkFkhZ ds lq;ksX; fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd Jh fouksn dqekj 'kekZ dk rdZ jgk gS fd nq?kZVuk ds oDr okgu pkyd ds ikl ykbV eksVj Oghdy pykus dk o





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top