DEEPAK MAHESHWARI
Ram Pal – Appellant
Versus
State of Raj – Respondent
Maheshwari, J.
1. Both these appeals have been filed by accused appellants ram pal and doulat, assailing the judgment dated 28.8.1991 passed by Special Court (Sati Nivaran) & Addl. Sessions Judge, Jaipur City, Jaipur in Sessions Case No. 18/90 convicting them for the offence punishable under Section 376(2)(g) IPC and awarding both of them sentence for rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years and imposing a fine of Rs. 100/- and additionally awarding rigorous imprisonment for one month in default of payment thereof.
2. Since both the appeals have arisen out of the same judgment, therefore, the same are being decided by this common judgment.
3. Briefly stated the facts giving rise to the appeals are that an FIR was lodged by one Bhanwar Singh at Police Station Shastri Nagar, Jaipur on 10.10.1988, alleging that when he came back home after his work at about 11 p.m. in the night on 9.10.1988, his wife Rukma told him that when she was sleeping in her home, at about 9.30 p.m., Doulat came there and forcibly took her to her other house, which was lying vacant. He pulled her down on the floor and with the intention to commit rape entered his part of the body in her body. She
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.