IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR
K.S. JHAVERI, M.N. BHANDARI, INDERJEET SINGH, JJ.
Commissioner of Income Tax, Jaipur-II, Jaipur - Appellant
Vs.
M/s. Gad Fashion, G-152, Riico Sanganer Industrial Area Jaipur - Respondent
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 575 of 2008
Decided On : 10-11-2017
JHAVERI, INDERJEET SINGH, JJ.
By way of reference, this Court vide order dated 05.07.2017 framed the following reference for consideration by the larger Bench.
“Whether the Department can take a contrary view than the circular which has been issued for reduction of arrears in the Supreme Court, High Courts and Tribunals and insist for arguing the matter on merits.”
2. The statutory provision which is required to be considered by us reads as under:
“268A. Filing of appeal or application for reference by income-tax authority. - (1) The Board may, from time to time, issue orders, instructions or directions to other income-tax authorities, fixing such monetary limits as it may deem fit, for the purpose of regulating filing of appeal or application for reference by any income-tax authority under the provisions of this Chapter.
(2) Where, in pursuance of the orders, instructions or directions issued under subsection (1), an income-tax authority has not filed any appeal or application for reference on any issue in the case of an assessee for any assessment year, it shall not preclude such authority from filing an appeal or application for reference on the same issue in the case of-
(a) the same assessee for any other assessment year; or
(b) any other assessee for the same or any other assessment year.
(3) Notwithstanding that no appeal or application for reference has been filed by an income-tax authority pursuant to the orders or instructions or directions issued under sub-section (1), it shall not be lawful for an assessee, being a party in any appeal or reference, to contend that the income-tax authority has acquiesced in the decision on the disputed issue by not filing an appeal or application for reference in any case.
(4) The Appellate Tribunal or Court, hearing such appeal or reference, shall have regard to the orders, instructions or directions issued under sub-section (1) and the circumstances under which such appeal or application for reference was filed or not filed in respect of any case.
(5) Every order, instruction or direction which has been issued by the Board fixing monetary limits for filing an appeal or application for reference shall be deemed to have been issued under sub-section (1) and the provisions of sub-sections (2), (3) and (4) shall apply accordingly.”
3. Another statutory provision which is required to be considered reads as under:
“119. Instructions to subordinate authorities. - (1) The Board may, from time to time, issue such orders, instructions and directions to other income-tax authorities as it may deem fit for the proper administration of this Act, and such authorities and all other persons employed in the execution of this Act shall observe and follow such orders, instructions and directions of the Board:
Provided that no such orders, instructions or directions shall be issued-
(a) so as to require any income-tax authority to make a particular assessment or to dispose of a particular case in a particular manner; or
(b) so as to interfere with the discretion of the Commissioner (Appeals) in the exercise of his appellate functions.
(2) Without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing power,-
(a) the Board may, if it considers it necessary or expedient so to do, for the purpose of proper and efficient management of the work of assessment and collection of revenue, issue, from time to time (whether by way of relaxation of any of the provisions of sections 115P, 115S, 115WD, 115WE, 115WF, 115WG, 115WH, 115WJ, 115WK, 139, 143, 144, 147, 148, 154, 155, 158BFA, sub-section (1A) of section 201, sections 210, 211, 234A, 234B, 234C, 271 and 273 or otherwise), general or special orders in respect of any class of incomes or fringe benefits or class of cases, setting forth directions or instructions (not being prejudicial to assessees) as to the guidelines, principles or procedures to be followed by other inco
Commissioner of Central Excise, Bolpur v. Ratan Melting and Wire Industries
Kalyani Packaging Industry v. Union of India (UOI)
Bengal Iron Corporation v. Commercial Tax Officer
Commissioner of Customs, Calcutta v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
CIT v. Blaze Advertising (Delhi) (P) Ltd.
State of Kerala v. Kurian Abraham Pvt. Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.