1. In pursuance of the directions in this petition, Mr. S.K Vyas, AAG along with Mr. Achal Singh, Investigating Officer produced the corpus Ms. Payal Singhvi before us.

2. We have ascertained from the corpus Payal Singhvi whether she is under any threat or inducement by any one, she refused and said that she is present in the Court as per her will.

3. Learned Senior Advocate Mr. M.R Singhvi and Mr. N.K Bohra, counsel for the petitioner vehemently argued that without any procedure for converting religion nobody can convert his or her religion and as per the judgment of Constitutional Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Rev. Stainislaus v. State of Madhya Pradesh [(1977) 1 SCC 677 : AIR 1977 SC 908], the rules for conversion of religion can be framed by the Sate Government. It is also submitted that all the documents filed before the Police to prove the conversion of religion by Payal Singhvi are doubtful and self contradictory, therefore, cannot be establish the fact of marriage.

4. It is also submitted that although Payal Singhvi is belonging to Hindu community and Faiez Modi belongs to Muslim community and under the threat the so-called Nikah is solemnized and co