PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Farhad Banu D/o Late Shri Abdul Qaiyoum – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI, J.
Since the controversy involved in all the present writ petitions is common, they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.
2. These writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India have been preferred, in sum and substance, with the following prayers:
“It is therefore, most humbly prayed that this writ petition may kindly be allowed with cost and by an appropriate writ, order or direction; the respondent No. 3 may kindly be directed to include the name of the petitioner as per her merit in the select list dated 24.10.2017 (Annex.12) and also directed to allot the district for verification of documents and counselling and further she may be given appointment on the post of Teacher Grade III Level II in subject of English with all consequential benefits Any other appropriate writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner.
Cost of the writ petition may kindly be awarded to the petitioner.”
3. Brief facts of these cases, as noticed by this Court, are that the petitioners were having the qualifica
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.