SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Raj) 90

SANDEEP MEHTA
Saidittamal S/o Vajirchand – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. H.R. Chawla, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr. M.S. Panwar, P.P., Mr. Akshay Surana, Advocate.

JUDGMENT/ORDER :

Mr. Sandeep Mehta, J.

By way of this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the accused petitioner has approached this Court for challenging the order dated 22.2.2014 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Padampur in Cr.Case No.106A/2014 whereby, the learned trial Judge took cognizance against him for the offence under Section 420 I.P.C. as affirmed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Srikaranpur in revision vide order dated 18.11.2016.

2. Facts in brief are that the respondent No.2 complainant filed a complaint in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Padampur on 16.5.2013 alleging inter-alia that the petitioner Saidittamal had sold half portion of his agricultural property ad measuring 5.15 Bighas to the complainants grandfather Shri Brijlal through a registered sale deed. Shri Brijlal executed a Will of the said land in favour of the complainant and his brother which continues to be in their possession. However, the complainant claims to have received information that the accused petitioner fraudulently mortgaged the very same chunk of land which he had sold long back, with the Oriental Bank of Commerce and took loan thereupon. U







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top