SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Raj) 163

AJAY RASTOGI
Shakuntala wife of Shri Naresh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Ms. Shalini Sheoran, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Dr. A.S. Khangarot, Addl. Govt. Counsel.

ORDER:

1. Matter has come up on the misc. application filed by the petitioner for recalling of the order dt.23.04.2011 & for restoration of the writ petition.

2. Counsel submits that in the writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order of penalty inflicted upon the delinquent after holding departmental enquiry dt.31.12.1997 and reply was filed by the respondents and at least the matter of penalty in no manner could be considered as infructuous and has to be examined on merits and it appears that under some misconception, the counsel made a request that the petition has become infructuous and the in the interest of justice, the order deserves to be recalled.

3. Having heard counsel for the parties, this court is also of the view that order which has been challenged in the writ petition has to be examined on merits and could not be construed as having become infructuous in any changed circumstances.

4. Accordingly, the instant misc. application is allowed. The order dt.23.04.2011 is recalled and S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8865/2007 is restored to its original number and may be listed before the regular Bench holding the subject roster.


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top