SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Raj) 194

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
ALOK SHARMA, J.
Vinod Choudhary Son of Shri Vardhi Chand Choudhary - Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan Through the Chief Secretary, Government of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur - Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1083 OF 2016
Decided On : 01-02-2018

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Saransh Saini.
For the Respondent: Mr. Ashish Kumar Sharma for Mr. Rajendra Prasad, AAG, Mr. Nikhil Simlote, Mr. Ravindra Paliwal.

A writ of quo warranto can be issued against an elected representative who lacks eligibility to hold public office, even if there is a statutory remedy of an election petition, if there is no real and bonafide dispute as to the alleged ineligibility.

Headnote:

QUO WARRANTO - ELECTION - RAJASTHAN PANCHAYATI RAJ ACT, 1994 - SECTION 19(T) - EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION - COURT'S JURISDICTION TO ISSUE WRIT OF QUO WARRANTO - DISPUTE AS TO ELIGIBILITY - INTERPRETATION OF SECTION 43 OF THE ACT AND ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner challenged the election of the respondent (RC) as Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, Ladana, Jaipur, on the ground that he was ineligible to contest the election due to lack of the minimum educational qualification of class VIII pass, as required under Section 19(t) of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Act, 1994.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the RC had claimed to have passed Class VIII from a school that was not recognized by the State Government at the time he claimed to have studied there. The court also found that the RC had previously claimed to be only literate in his nomination form for the same post in 2010.

Issues: 1. Whether a writ of quo warranto is maintainable to challenge the election of a candidate who was ineligible to contest due to lack of educational qualification? 2. Whether there was a real and bonafide dispute as to the RC's ineligibility?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that a writ of quo warranto can be issued against an elected representative who lacks eligibility to hold public office, even if there is a statutory remedy of an election petition, if there is no real and bonafide dispute as to the alleged ineligibility. 2. The court found that there was no real and bonafide dispute as to the RC's ineligibility, as it was evident from public documents that he did not have the required educational qualification.

Final Decision: The court allowed the petition, declared the RC ineligible to hold the post of Sarpanch, and directed his removal from the post.

JUDGMENT :

1. In this petition for a writ of quo warranto, the right of the respondent no. 4 – Returned Candidate (hereafter ‘RC’) to hold the post of Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, Ladana, Tehsil Phagi, District Jaipur despite his election on the said post has been challenged on the ground that he was ineligible to contest the election for reason of his not having the statutorily mandated minimum educational qualification of class VIII pass.

2. It has been submitted by Mr. Saransh Saini, counsel for the petitioner that Elections to the Gram Panchayat Ladhana, Tehsil Phagi, District Jaipur were held on 24.1.2015. The RC filed his nomination form despite his ineligibility to contest the election for the post of Sarpanch. That was on the basis of forged and fabricated documents. The nomination form filled in by the RC was not appropriately considered by the Returning Officer and in fact with his collusion the RC had been allowed to contest. Mr. Saransh Saini further submitted that in his declaration form under Clause-5, the RC claimed that he had passed Class-VIII from Tagore Vidhya Mandir Senior Secondary School, Bandikui, District Dausa (hereafter ‘the school’), whereas earlier in the year 2010 when the RC had also contested the election for the post of Sarpanch, in his nomination form he did not disclose that purported educational qualification of having passed Class-VIII but only stated that he was ‘literate’. That, he submitted was evident from the result sheet of Gram Panchayat, Ladhana, Tehsil Phagi, District Jaipur with regard to the elections held for the post of Sarpanch in the year 2010 (Annexure-3).

3. Mr. Saransh Saini further submitted that the minimum educational qualification statutorily prescribed for contesting election for the post of Sarpanch is class-VIII pass from a recognised Government school. Section 19(t) of the Act of 1994 so states. He submitted that as per Annexure-5 – the Transfer Certificate was belatedly purportedly issued by the school to RC on 1.7.2005 while on his own case he was allegedly admitted to the said school in Class-VI on 1.7.1986 and left it after allegedly passing Class-VIII on 15.5.1990. Mr. Saransh Saini submitted that vide letter dated 3.5.1991 under the hand of the District Education Officer, Ist (Annexure-6), permanent recognition to the school in issue was given w.e.f. 1.7.1991 and permission to run class-VI obtained only commencing Academic Session 1991-92. In this view of the uncontrovertible public document on record it is pellucid, Mr. Saransh Saini submitted that in the years 1986-87, 1987-88 and 1988-89, when the RC claims to have studied in Class-VI, VII and VIII in the school in issue it was not even recognized to admit students to the said classes.

4. Mr. Saransh Saini further pointed out that one Ghasi Ram as also the petitioner both filed criminal complaints against the RC for offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B IPC under Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Act, 1973 which were sent to the concerned Police Station for investigation. FIR No.134/2015 was registered and after investigation, the police submitted a charge sheet no. 206/2015 against the RC on 20.10.2015. It has also been submitted that against the administration of the school, several complaints were filed for issuing forged and fabricated marks sheets and certificates. In FIR No.111/2015 registered at Police Station, Bandikui for the offence under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC, Manager of the said school Shiv Prasad Tiwari and another, one Dalchand Raiger were arrested and during the course of investigation, the Investigation Officer recovered forged SR Register, Transfer Certificates, forged seals as also the diaries from them.

5. Mr. Saransh Saini emphatically submitted that in view of the incontrovertible facts based on public records against the RC, he was clearly ineligible to contest the election to the post of Sarpanch in 2015, yet so did on suppression of material facts and asse














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top