SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Raj) 222

DEEPAK MAHESHWARI
Vinod Goyal S/o Shri Malaram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Amit Punia.
For the Respondent: Mr. Aladeen Khan, PP

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard learned counsel for the accused-petitioners as also learned Public Prosecutor.

The petitioners had faced trial for the offences under Sections 420, 120-B & 406 IPC. The trial court ordered the conviction and sentence of the accused-petitioners in the following manner :-

1.

Criminal Case No.479/2016 judgment dated 04.10.2017

Sec.406 IPC

 

Sec. 120-B IPC

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sec. 420 IPC

Acquitted

 

For One year simple imprisonment and fine of Rs.2000/- and in default of payment of fine, further to undergo two months simple imprisonment.

 

For Two years simple imprisonment and fine of Rs.8000/- and in default of payment of fine, further to undergo four months simple imprisonment.

2.

Criminal Case No.171/2016 judgment dated 25.09.2017

Sec.406 IPC

 

Sec.120-B IPC

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sec.420 IPC

 

Acquitted

 

For Six months simple imprisonment and fine of Rs.1000/- and in default of payment of fine, further to undergo 15 days simple imprisonment.

 

For Two years simple imprisonment and fine of Rs.90












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top