KELIYA @ KAILASH vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN, THROUGH P. P.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2017 Supreme(Raj) 1853

DEEPAK MAHESHWARI
KELIYA @ KAILASH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN, THROUGH P. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. N.A. Naqvi, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Mukesh Kumar Meena, Advocate,
For the Respondent: Ms. Meenakshi Pareek,

JUDGMENT :

Deepak Maheshwari, J.

Accused-appellants Keliya @ Kailash and Shambhu have preferred this appeal to challenge the judgment impugned dated 17.1.1995 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Beawar, District Ajmer in Sessions Case No. 44/94, whereby the accused-appellants have been convicted and sentenced for the offences mentioned below :-

Keliya @ Kailash :

1

Section 325 IPC

For Three years rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs. 500/- and in default of payment of fine further to undergo one month's imprisonment.

2

Section 323/34 IPC

For One month rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs. 100/- and in default of payment of fine further to undergo seven days' imprisonment.

Shambhu :

1	Section 325/34 IPC	For Three years rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs. 500/- and in default of payment of fine further to undergo one month's imprisonment.
2	Section 323 IPC	For One month rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs. 100/- and in default of payment of fine further to undergo seven days' imprisonment.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1	Section 325 IPC	For Three years rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs. 500/- and in default of payment of fine further to undergo one month's imprisonment.
2	Section 323/34 IPC	For One month rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs. 100/- and in default of payment of fine further to undergo seven days' imprisonment.

2017 Supreme(Raj) 1853

DEEPAK MAHESHWARIKELIYA @ KAILASH – AppellantVersusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN, THROUGH P. P. – Respondent

DEEPAK MAHESHWARI
KELIYA @ KAILASH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN, THROUGH P. P. – Respondent