SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Raj) 1874

PANKAJ BHANDARI
SURESH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Ms. Sikha Parnami, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Dileep Singh Jadaun, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

PANKAJ BHANDARI, J.

1. Criminal Revision Nos.1205/2016 has been preferred by husband and 1206/2016 has been preferred by mother-in-law and father-in-law aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 12.04.2014 passed by Additional Civil Judge (J.D.) and Judicial Magistrate, Kishangarh who awarded Rs. 2,500/- per month under Section 19 for residence, Rs. 2,000/- per month for maintenance under Section 20 and Rs. 1,00,000/- as one time compensation under section 22 of the Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005 and against the judgment and order dated 21.11.2015 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Kishangarh whereby the appeal was partly allowed and the amount awardable as maintenance was directed to be adjusted with the amount awarded in other proceedings, the appellate Court further reduced the one time compensation from Rs. 1,00,000/- to Rs. 25,000/- under section 22 of the Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

2. Criminal Revision Nos.128/2016 and 236/2016 have been preferred by wife Smt. Seema aggrieved by the order of the appellate Court dated 21.11.2015 vide which the appellate Court has reduced the one time compensation from Rs. 1,00,000/- to




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top