PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
SUBHASH CHANDRA NAIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI, J.
1. Defects stand overruled.
2. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred claiming the following reliefs:
"(i) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, in the nature thereof, thereby the respondents be directed to prepare the fresh final merit list/selection list by awarding 10 bonus marks for each year to the petitioners in pursuance of the order dated 29.11.2016 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and clause 9.ii of the advertisement and give appointment to the petitioners on the post of Nurse Grade II, with all consequential benefits.
(ii) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, in the nature thereof, thereby, the respondents be directed to give 10 bonus marks to the petitioners for each year of experience.
(iii) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, in the nature thereof, thereby the action of the respondent whereby they have given only 5 bonus marks and maximum 15 bonus marks while making merit list be declared illegal and the same be quashed and set aside.
(iv) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, in the lying vacant 4,745 posts are as per advertisement on dated 26.02.2013 fo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.