SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Raj) 1969

VIRENDRA KUMAR MATHUR
Sarita W/o Bheem Singh – Appellant
Versus
Bheem Singh S/o Mani Ram Godara – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Rakesh Matoria, Advocate Kshamendra Mathur, Advocate H.R. Chawla, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Virendra Kumar Mathur, J.

1. This Transfer Application under sec.24 CPC has been filed for transfer of Civil Misc. Case No.18/2017 (Bheem Singh v. Sarita), filed by the respondent under sec.25 read with sec.13 of the Hindu Guardian & Wards Act, pending before the Family Court, Sriganganagar, to the court of Additional District Judge, Suratgarh, District Sriganganagar.

2. Briefly stated, marriage of t he parties was solemnized on 27.03.2000 at Pilibanga. Out of the wedlock, three children were born, namely Kirtika aged about 13 years, Vartika aged about 09 years and Ditasha @ Diva aged about 4 years. All three children are residing with the petitioner. The respondent is resident of Binjhbayla. He used to reside in joint family and his family depends purely on agriculture work for their living.

3. A petition under secs.25 and 13 of the Hindu Guardians and Wards Act was filed by the respondent-husband before Family Court, Sriganganagar. Transfer of this case, pending before the Family Judge, Sriganganagar to Suratgarh is sought on the ground that it is admitted position that parental house of the petitioner is situated at Suratgarh and all the three children are residing wit







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top