P.K. Lohra, J.

Petitioner-husband has preferred this revision petition under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C. to question legality and propriety of order dated 9th of January 2015, passed by Addl. Sessions Judge, Sujangarh, District Churu (for short, 'learned appellate Court'), accepting appeal of respondent-wife under Section 29 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (for short, 'Act of 2005') and besetting order dated 17th of September, 2014, passed by Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sujangarh, District Churu (for short, 'learned trial Court'). By the order impugned, learned appellate Court has annulled the order of learned trial Court passed under Section 21 of the Act of 2005 allowing the petitioner visitation rights to meet his minor son Master Arjun on court dates.

2. The factual matrix, giving rise to this revision petition, is that respondent-wife laid an application under Section 12 of the Act of 2005 before learned trial Court against petitioner craving relief of different denominations under Section 20 and 22 of the Act of 2005. When the proceedings on application under Section 12 of the Act of 2005 were in vogue before the learned trial Court, petition